As per case facts, petitioners, working as Lab Technicians through a placement agency, had their services terminated by orders dated 29.05.2026 and 01.06.2026. Simultaneously, appointments were made under the Rajasthan ...
No Acts & Articles mentioned in this case
[2026:RJ-JP:28745]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10216/2026
CNR: RJHC020540532026 | URN: CW / 22714U / 2026
1. Rakesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Ramawatar Saini, Aged
About 33 Years, Resident Of Gram Post Baniyana Lawan,
Dausa
2. Arabaz Khan S/o Nijamuddin Khan, Aged About 34 Years,
Resident Of Plot No 201, Behind Of Eidgha, Eidgha
Colony, Dausa (303303)
3. Vijay Kumar Meena S/o Shri Ramniwas Meena, Aged
About 31 Years, Resident Of Gudhliya, Bandikui, Dausa
4. Jagmohan Meena S/o Shri Uday Chand Meena, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Vill. Beerasana, Post.
Dholkhera, T. Mahwa, Dist Dausa, Raj.
5. Pankaj Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Phool Chand Sharma,
Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Lav-Kush Nagar Dausa
6. Bhawani Prajapat S/o Shri Simbhu Prajapat, Aged About
30 Years, Resident Of Village - Post-Hingotiya, Teh-Lawan,
Dausa
7. Vinayak Sharma S/o Shri Mahendra Kumar Sharma, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of G-49 Chitragupt Colony,
Dausa
8. Gaurav Soni S/o Shri Suresh Soni, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Near Old Hospital, Ghas Mandi, Dausa (Raj)
9. Rakesh Verma S/o Shri Ramgopal Raigar, Aged About 22
Years, Resident Of Garm- Hamirpur, Po.- Samra, Teh.-
Pratapgarh, Dist Alwar
10. Samay Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Jai Singh Gurjar, Aged
About 25 Years, Resident Of Haripura, Bandikui, Dausa
11. Anil Singh S/o Shri Prithvee Singh, Aged About 32 Years,
Resident Of Chak Alipura, Post Palunda, Teh Rahuwash,
Dausa
12. Padam Singh Gaur S/o Shri Hari Singh Gaur, Aged About
30 Years, Resident Of Vill-Barkhera, Post-Kherwal, Th-Dis-
Dausa
13. Chandermohan Meena S/o Shri Ramkishor Meena, Aged
About 33 Years, Resident Of Basant Vihar Colony,
Gupteshwar Road, Dausa
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (2 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
14. Manish Kumar Gurjar S/o Shri Mohar Singh Gurjar, Aged
About 35 Years, Resident Of Vpo Pancholi, Tehsil Sikrai,
Dist Dausa
15. Sitaram Meena S/o Shri Malkhan Meena, Aged About 25
Years, Resident Of Village- Meenapara, Post- Meenapara,
Teh- Bejupada, Dist-Dausa
16. Atul Poswal S/o Shri Gajraj Singh, Aged About 25 Years,
Resident Of Narayan Pura, Bandikui, Dausa
17. Abhishek Gurjar S/o Shri Babulal Gurjar, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Devari, Lawan, Dausa
18. Ravi Kumar Saini S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Saini, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Prempuriya Ki Dhani, Baswa,
Dausa
19. Mausami Kumari Meena S/o Shri Matadeen Meena, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Rajpura, Post. Jopada, Dist.
Dausa,
20. Mansingh Bairwa S/o Shri Harinarayan Bairwa, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Vill-Post-Bhandarez Mod,
Teh-Dist-Dausa
21. Deepanshu Tiwari S/o Shri Rajendra Prasad Sharma,
Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Bhojwada, Dhanawar,
Dausa
22. Aayushma Dube S/o Shri Radhagovind Sharma, Aged
About 25 Years, Resident Of Govind Dev Ji Mandir, Modi
Ka Tibara, Agra Road, Dausa
23. Yogesh Kumar Prajapat S/o Shri Saudan Prajapat, Aged
About 23 Years, Resident Of Titarwara Khurd, Dausa
24. Babu Lal Meena S/o Shri Ramswaroop Meena, Aged About
29 Years, Resident Of Gram Shriya, Po. Amrabad, Teh
Ramgarh Pachwara, Dist-Dausa
25. Manisha Kumari Saini S/o Shri Ramgopal Saini, Aged
About 33 Years, Resident Of Hodi Ka Gola Mund Ghisya
Dausa
26. Rooma Bai Gurjar D/o Shri Sahabsingh Gurjar W/o Shri
Ramavtar Gurjar, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Dhani
Dhabhai Ki Banskho, Po- Banskho, Dist. Jaipur
27. Kamal Kant Sharma S/o Shri Yogesh Chand Sharma, Aged
About 33 Years, Resident Of Narayanpur, Teh. Thanagazi,
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (3 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
Alwar
28. Jayveer Singh S/o Shri Prahlad Singh, Aged About 33
Years, Resident Of Tudawali, Post-Parla, Teh Todabhim,
Dist Karauli
29. Ramsingh Meena S/o Shri Herlal Meena, Aged About 30
Years, Resident Of Vpo-Bairer, Tehsil Reni, Dist-Alwar
30. Samay Singh Meena S/o Shri Ummedi Lal Meena, Aged
About 32 Years, Resident Of Vill Patti Sleh Singh, Post
Thikariya, Teh. Sikrai, Distt. Dausa
31. Lokesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Kailash Chand Saini, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Gram - Post Bahrawanda,
Teh Bahrawanda, Dist Dausa
32. Satish Kumar Gurjar S/o Shri Ramsingh Gurjar, Aged
About 31 Years, Resident Of Gram - Post Torda, Teh
Bahrawanda, Dist Dausa
33. Suresh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Sanwal Ram Meena, Aged
About 29 Years, Resident Of Bhudharpura, Po. Tunga, Th.
Tunga, Dist- Jaipur
34. Jitendra Kumar Saini S/o Shri Ghasi Lal Saini, Aged About
30 Years, Resident Of Vpo-Mohching Pura, Tehsil-
Baharawanda, District Dausa
35. Kaushal Sharma S/o Shri Ramdayal Sharma, Aged About
32 Years, Resident Of V.p. Kalakho, Ambari, Th.
Bahrawanda, Dausa
36. Meetha Lal Meena S/o Shri Harinarayan Meena, Aged
About 32 Years, Resident Of Malawas, Post. Devari, Teh
Bahrawanda, Dist Dausa
37. Roshani Yogi D/o Shri Babulal Yogi, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Of Basant Vihar Colony, Guptesher Road, Dausa
(Rajasthan)
38. Pushpendra Kumar Meena S/o Shri Kamalram Meena,
Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Bada Mohalla, Salawad,
Karauli
39. Nirmal Kumar Meena S/o Shri Nehrulal Meena, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Gaon- Saray, Gandal, Teh.
Bamanwas, Sawaimadhopur
40. Hariyant Bairwa S/o Shri Harish Chand Bairwa, Aged
About 31 Years, Resident Of Malgawas, Dausa
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (4 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
41. Dheeraj Kumar Meena S/o Shri Bijendra Kumar Meena,
Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Mahadev Nagar, Gali
No. 5, Jagatpura, Jaipur
42. Meenakshi D/o Shri Har Prasad, Aged About 26 Years,
Resident Of Sikroli, Bharatpur
43. Ajay Meena S/o Shri Laxmi Chand Meena, Aged About 30
Years, Resident Of Gram- Kanloda, Po Kalyanupura, Teh.
Lalsot, Dist-Dausa
44. Anil Meena S/o Shri Mool Chand Meena, Aged About 25
Years, Resident Of Gram-Rajpura, Post-Jopada, Teh-Dist-
Dausa
45. Rinku Gurjar D/o Shri Birbal Gurjar W/o Shri Vijay Singh
Gurjar, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Ramsar, Post
Bhoorla, Teh Bassi, Dist- Jaipur
46. Sunil Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Radhe Shyam Sharma,
Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village-Kherla Khurd,
Post-Hingotiya, Tehsil-Lawan, District-Dausa
47. Kapil Saini S/o Shri Vijay Raj Saini, Aged About 27 Years,
Resident Of Ward No. 33, Surya Mandir Cinema Ke Piche,
Panchsheel Nagar, Dausa
48. Subhash Chand Meena S/o Shri Thandi Ram Meena, Aged
About 32 Years, Resident Of Gram - Post- Gerota, Tehsil-
Sikrai, District-Dausa
49. Punit Bhardwaj S/o Shri Manoj Kumar Bhardwaj, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Man Club Ke Paas, Shiv
Colony, Dausa
50. Pavan Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Babu Lal Sharma, Aged
About 34 Years, Resident Of Vill - Post- Khawaraoji, Dhani
Purohitan, Th Paparda, Dist- Dausa
51. Ramkesh Meena S/o Ramphool Meena, Aged About 35
Years, Resident Of Ram Kripal Ka Bas, Parbaini, Teh. Reni,
Dist. Alwar
52. Umresh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Sirmohar Meena, Aged
About 34 Years, Resident Of Gram Post Bada Bujurg, Teh.
Mahwa, Dist- Dausa
53. Ratiram Gurjar S/o Shri Sitaram Gurjar, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Vill-Post- Mundkishya, Th-Bhandaraj,
Dist- Dausa
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (5 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
54. Apoorva Andana D/o Shri Gopal Lal Gurjar, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Village-Kherli, Post-Kherli, Tehsil-
Dausa, District-Dausa
55. Shahrukh Khan S/o Shri Ahsan Khan, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Deshwali Mohalla, Dausa
56. Shahid Khan S/o Shri Saeed Khan, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Nagouri Mohalla, Masjid Ke Pass, Dausa.
57. Narendra Rolaniya S/o Shri Rameshwar Prasad Jat, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 09, Shahpura,
Jaipur
58. Narendra Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Laxman Singh Gurjar,
Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of V/p-Abhaneri, Teh-
Bandikui, Dist-Dausa-303326.
59. Ramsagar Meena S/o Shri Ramkaran Meena, Aged About
30 Years, Resident Of Kali Khadki Dhani, Vill-Gadholi, P-
Hansmahal, T-Bassi, Jaipur
60. Chandra Shekhar Sharma S/o Shri Jitendra Kumar
Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Gram Jitpur,
Po. Kallawas, Teh. Rahuwas, District-Dausa
61. Sunil Kumar Saini S/o Shri Kailash Chand Saini, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Gram-Post Mohchingpura,
Teh. Bahrawanda, District-Dausa
62. Vikas S/o Shri Hansram Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years,
Resident Of Vill-Tudawali, Post-Parla, Teh-Todabhim, Dist-
Karauli
63. Rohit Sharma S/o Shri Kailash Sharma, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Bhanpur Kalan, Teh. Jamwaramgarh,
Jaipur
64. Ankit Bansiwal S/o Shri Ramkishan Banshiwal, Aged
About 23 Years, Resident Of Dhani Sekhpur, Thumdi,
Dausa.
65. Ashish Saini S/o Shri Babu Lal Saini, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Jhalra Ka Bas, Dausa.
66. Ramkesh Meena S/o Shri Bhouri Lal Meena, Aged About
26 Years, Resident Of Deeppura, Post-Chawandiyan, Via-
Bassi, Tehsil-Andhi (Jamwaramgarh), District-Jaipur
67. Mohit Pancholi S/o Shri Chiranjilal Sharma, Aged About
27 Years, Resident Of Vill-Meetarwari, Post-Delari, Teh-
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (6 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
Bandikui, Dausa
68. Ramu Gurjar S/o Shri Ramkaran Gurjar, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Ramsar Palwala, Jitawala, Jaipur.
69. Om Prakash Meena S/o Shri Kalyan Sahay Meena, Aged
About 36 Years, Resident Of Vpo-Gudhliya, Teh-Bandikui,
Dist-Dausa
70. Hukam Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Ganga Ram Gurjar, Aged
About 31 Years, Resident Of Pura Khawarwaji, Dhani
Mahaman, Dausa.
71. Aman Sharma S/o Shri Rakesh Sharma, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Teacher Colony, Agra, Uttar Pradesh.
72. Neeraj Kumar Meena S/o Shri Ramkhiladi Meena, Aged
About 35 Years, Resident Of Hurla, Dausa.
73. Sonu Bai S/o Shri Bhart Bhushan Yadav, Aged About 30
Years, Resident Of Beechpur, Peepli, Alwar
74. Gajanand Kasana S/o Shri Hukam Singh, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Ramgarh, Brahman Bairada, Dausa.
75. Ravindra Singh S/o Shri Sardar Singh Gurjar, Aged About
30 Years, Resident Of Gahnoli, Teh Mahwa, Dist-Dausa.
76. Hansraj Saini S/o Shri Lalluram Saini, Aged About 32
Years, Resident Of Gram Haripura, Po. Koliyada, Teh.
Rahuwas, District-Dausa
77. Ravi Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Gopal Lal Sharma, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Vill-Salempura, Teh-
Rahuwas, Dist.-Dausa (Raj)
78. Aditya Saini S/o Shri Satya Narayan Saini, Aged About 31
Years, Resident Of Babaji Ki Chhawani, City, Power House
Ke Pass, Dausa
79. Vishnu Prasad Sharma S/o Shri Gauri Shankar Sharma,
Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Rampurawas, Dudhali,
Jaipur.
80. Mahavir Singh S/o Shri Dharamveer Singh, Aged About
24 Years, Resident Of Tudawali, Karauli.
81. Rakesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Ishwar Mal Sharma, Aged
About 35 Years, Resident Of Vill-Birkari, Post-Golakabas,
Tehsil-Tehla, Dist-Alwar
82. Bhoopendra Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Ram Khiladi Gurjar,
Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Ralawata, Bandikui,
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (7 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
Dausa
83. Mohit Kumar Sain, S/o Prabhu Dayal Sain, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Village-Deshri, Post-Pakhar, Tehsil-
Mahwa, District-Dausa, Rajasthan
84. Rahul Sharma S/o Shri Krishan Sharma, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Ram Nagar Colony, Baswa Road, Jagir
Bandikui
85. Shivam Sharma S/o Shri Prakash Chand Sharma, Aged
About 24 Years, Resident Of Meeno Ka Badh, Nayla,
Jaipur, Rajasthan
86. Jitendra Kumar Sain S/o Shri Mulchand Sain, Aged About
35 Years, Resident Of Vill. Post-Royal, Via-Khandela
District-Sikar
87. Khushika Kumawat D/o Shri Laxmi Narayan Kumawat,
Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of B-58, Lal Kothi Yojana,
Sahkar Marg, Gandhi Nagar, Lal Kothi, Jaipur
88. Gaytri Sharma D/o Shri Ramlal Sharma, Aged About 24
Years, Resident Of Village-Kolana, Tehsil-Baswa, District-
Dausa
89. Ramesh Chand Saini S/o Shri Heera Lal Saini, Aged About
31 Years, Resident Of Aamli Wali Dhani, Jagatpura Road,
Kho-Nagorian, Jaipur
90. Asrar Ahmed S/o Shri Shajad Ahmed, Aged About 30
Years, Resident Of 181, Nagauri Mohalla, Dausa
91. Abhishek Sharma S/o Shri Kailash Chandra Sharma, Aged
About 24 Years, Resident Of Kesar Dham, Hardi Road,
Kanota, Bassi, Jaipur
92. Manoj Sharma S/o Shri Radheshyam Sharma, Aged About
26 Years, Resident Of Kalyanpura, Post-Dhudhli, Bassi,
District-Jaipur
93. Dharmraj Gurjar S/o Shri Raja Ram Gurjar, Aged About
25 Years, Resident Of Bhajka Ki Dhani, Dausa
94. Manisha Yadav S/o Shri Rajwant Singh, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Plot No. 93, Yagdutt Nagar, Niwaru
Road, Jaipur
95. Manish Sharma S/o Shri Gordhan Lal Sharma, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Kalyanpura, Bassi, Jaipur,
Rajasthan
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (8 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
96. Saurabh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Mukesh Kumar, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Opposite Post Office, Mohalla
Kundal, Dausa
97. Suryakant Sharma S/o Shri Badri Narayan Sharma, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Kalyanpura, Bassi, Jaipur,
Rajasthan
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary
Medical Education Department, Government Secretariat
Jaipur
2. The Director, Rajasthan Medical Education Society, Sethi
Colony, Jaipur.
3. The Additional Director (Administration), Rajasthan
Medical Education Society, Sethi Colony, Jaipur
4. The Principal, Government Medical College, Dausa
5. M/s. Deepak Enterprises, Through Its Proprietor, Having
Its Office At 209, Temple Satya Narayan Ji, Surajpol
Bazar, Jaipur.
6. The Government Medical College, Through Its Principal
(Pandit Naval Kishore Sharma Medical College, Dausa)
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10230/2026
CNR: RJHC020551442026 | URN: CW / 22741U / 2026
1. Vinod Meena S/o Shri Ramkesh Meena, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Village And Post Gunesara, Tehsil And District
Karoli.
2. Ramavtar Meena S/o Amrit Lal Meena, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Village Beejalpur, Tehsil And District Karauli
322255.
3. Rahul Kumar Sharma S/o Shivcharan Sharma, Aged
About 28 Years, R/o Shivpuri Ward 35, Tehsil Gangapur
City, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan, 322201.
4. Saurabh Gupta S/o Raghuveer Prasad Gupta, Aged About
27 Years, R/o Bas Operator Dharmshala Kd Piche Indra
Colony, Tehsil And District Karauli, Rajasthan, 322241.
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (9 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
5. Shadab Ali S/o Ashfak Ali, Aged About 29 Years, Chikne
Farsh Ke Niche Khar Road, Karauli, Rajasthan. 322241.
6. Pankaj Kumar Parashar S/o Dhirendra Kumar Parashar,
Aged About 33 Years, Tambe Ki Tori, Masalpur Gate Ke
Pass, Bhatavat Ka Danda, Karauli, Rajasthan, 322241.
7. Ms.shakuntala Meena S/o Shivraj Meena, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Deeppura, Manchi, Karauli.
8. Surendra Singh Meena S/o Rameshwar Meena, Aged
About 39 Years, R/o Gurjar Mohalla Arniya, Arniya Post-
Naugaon, Arniya, Po Naugaon, District Sawai Madhopur,
Rajasthan - 322201
9. Rahul Kumar Meena S/o Gulab Singh Meena, Aged About
34 Years, R/o Gram Post Bhavli, Tehsil Masalpura District
Karauli, Rajasthan - 322242.
10. Vijay Singh Jatav S/o Bharosi Lal Jatav, Aged About 37
Years, R/o Mandrail, District Karauli, Rajasthan-322251.
11. Sandeep Sain S/o Ashok Kumar Sain, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Shiv Vihar Holi Khidkiyan Bahar, Karauli, Post
Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan - 322241.
12. Abhishek Meena S/o Jai Singh Meena, R/o Arawali Nagar,
Stadium Ke Samne, Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan
322241.
13. Ms.kranti Kumari D/o Ramveer Mali, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Village Sati Ka Pura, Gurdah, District Karauli,
Rajasthan, 322242.
14. Anuj Meena D/o Kailash Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Viilage Khandepura,post Ranipura, Tehsil Mandrayal,
District Karauli, Rajasthan - 322251
15. Deepak Kumar S/o Raju Lal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o
Hindaun Gate Bahar, Karauli, Post Karauli, District Karauli,
Rajasthan - 322241
16. Rahul Sharma S/o Sunil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Post Office Ke Pass Indra Colony, Karauli,
District Karauli, Rajasthan - 322241
17. Sanjesh Kumar Meena S/o Dhan Singh Meena, Aged
About 34 Years, R/o Dikoli Kalan, Po- Kachroda, Dist-
Karauli, Rajasthan - 322255
18. Rajiv Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Kailash Prasad Sharma,
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (10 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
Aged About 38 Years, R/o Opposite Hospital Amela
House, Mandrayal, Mandrail, Karauli, Rajasthan - 322251.
19. Akash Sharma S/o Arun Kumar Sharma, R/o Village
Brahman Pada Kalyani Post Kalyani Tehsil Karauli Distt
Karauli 322243.
20. Dileep Chand Meena S/o Kedar Lal Meena, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Gram Dabra, Tehsil Sapotra, District Karauli,
Rajasthan, 322255.
21. Kalpit Tiwari S/o Madan Mohan Tiwari, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Indra Colony, Karauli, District Karauli,
Rajasthan-322241.
22. Rahul Kumar Meena S/o Munshi Lal Meena, Aged About
33 Years, R/o Vill Post Gadhauli, Tehsil Masalpur, Dist
Karauli 322241.
23. Trivendra Chaudhary S/o Siyaram Jat, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Khera, Karauli, Rajasthan, 322234.
24. Pintu Meena S/o Munna Lal Meena, Aged About 32 Years,
R/o Village Langra, Teh-Mandraval, District Karauli,
Rajasthan-322249
25. Radhey Shyam Meena S/o Balbhadra Meena, Aged About
36 Years, R/o 43, Near School, Village Nayagaon, Post
Ranipura, District Karauli, Rajasthan-322251.
26. Dhan Singh Meena S/o Bahadur Meena, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Gadi Ka Ghav Village, Post Harnagar, Tehsil
Mandrayal, District Karauli, Rajasthan, 322249.
27. Rizwa Nujjma S/o Khursheed Ahamad, Aged About 38
Years, R/o Madina Maszid K Pass, Dholi Khar, Karauli,
Karauli, Rajasthan-322241.
28. Dayanand S/o Shri Radhey Shyam, Aged About 41 Years,
R/o Satyvati Vihar Colony, Karauli District Karauli
Rajasthan - 222241.
29. Dinesh Kumar Bairwa S/o Bachchu Lal Bairwa, Aged
About 38 Years, R/o Inayati, Karauli, Rajasthan, 322218.
30. Sandeep Kumar Meena S/o Hari Ram Meena, Aged About
34 Years, R/o Dikoli Kalan, Kachroda, District Karauli,
Rajasthan, 322255.
31. Rajesh Singh Gurjar S/o Mohan Singh Gurjar, Aged About
27 Years, R/o Akbarpur, Shri Mahavir Ji, Karauli,
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (11 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
Akbarpur, Karauli, Rajasthan - 322220.
32. Rahul Vyas S/o Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Chatikna, Karauli, Rajasthan, 322241
33. Rahul Chetiwal S/o Teekaram Chetiwal, Aged About 38
Years, R/o Near Petrol Pump Gangapur Road Nadoti
Karauli Rajasthan -322215.
34. Roopsingh Meena R/o Ganpati Meena, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Village Darra, Rodhai Post Rodhai, District
Karauli, Rajasthan-322251.
35. Nitesh Upadhyaya S/o Bal Krishan Sharma, Aged About
28 Years, R/o Makan No. 392, Head Post Office Ke Pass,
Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan - 322241.
36. Veer Singh Gurjar S/o Unche Singh, Aged About 25 Years,
R/o Ruggapura, Post Sunderpura, District Karauli,
Rajasthan - 322241.
37. Vijay Ram Meena S/o Siyaram Meena, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Village Santhalpur, Tehsil Langra, District
Karauli, Rajasthan, 322249.
38. Mansingh Meena S/o Batti Lal Meena, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Manda Meenapura, Manda,
Karauli, Rajasthan-322203.
39. Narsee Lal Meena S/o Kadami Lal Meena, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Gram Post-Meena Baroda, Wazeerpur, Swai
Madhopur, Wazeerpur, Rajasthan - 322219.
40. Monu Bainsla S/o Bhanu Pratap Singh Gurjar, Aged About
27 Years, R/o Bhim Nagar, Panday Ka Kunaa Hindaun
Road, Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan, 322241.
41. Dheeraj Sharma S/o Ramniwas Sharma, Aged About 27
Years, R/o 132, Kv Gss Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan
42. Deshraj Meena S/o Prakash Meena, Aged About 33 Years,
R/o Meena Baroda, Post Meena Baroda, District Sawai
Madhopur Rajasthan-322219.
43. Brajesh Kumar Bairwa S/o Shri Ramdayal Bairwa, Aged
About 40 Years, R/o Near Government Hospital, Sapotra,
Post Sapotra, District Karauli, Rajasthan - 322218
44. Yogesh Singh S/o Rekh Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
Village Juginpura, District Karauli Rajasthan, 32224.
45. Ms. Jyoti Banshiwal D/o Papaiya Ram, Aged About 28
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (12 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
Years, R/o Jatawada Road, New Colony, Jatav Basti,
Suroth, Post Suroth, District Karauli, Rajasthan-322252.
46. Ms. Ankita Meena S/o Narayan Singh, Aged About 30
Years, R/o 124, Meena Pada, Tehsil Mandirayal,
Dargawan, Pancholi, Karauli, Distt. Karauli.
47. Ajay Singh Gurjar S/o Dayaram Gurjar, Aged About 23
Years, R/o Road Kalan, Karauli, District Karauli.
48. Ms. Rishi Bai W/o Rukam Kesh Meena, Aged About 33
Years, R/o Gunesra Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan-
322241.
49. Ashok Tatawat S/o Chiranji Lal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o
157, Jatav Basti, Karasai, Karauli, Karsai, Karauli, Karsai,
Rajasthan, 322243.h
50. Nimish Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Ravindra Kumar Gupta,
Aged About 26 Years, R/o Choudhary Ki Bagichi, Stadium
Ke Pass, Karauli.
51. Ashok Singh S/o Shri Beerbal Singh, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Jugeenpura, Karauli.
52. Umesh Kumar Mudgal S/o Shri Harinarayan Sharma,
Aged About 27 Years, R/o Behind Shayam Marriage
Garden, Vivek Vihar Colony, Karauli.
53. Jai Prakash Prajapat S/o Shri Chatru Lal Prajapat, Aged
About 26 Years, R/o 229, Prajapat Basti, Hathipura,
Raghuvansi, Karauli, District Karauli.
54. Aditya Gupta S/o Shri Radha Mohan Gupta, Aged About
28 Years, R/o Ramleela Chock, Mandrail Karauli.
55. Himanshu Mudgal S/o Shri Jamana Lal Mudgal, Aged
About 25 Years, R/o Behind Zila Parishad, Karauli, District
Karauli.
56. Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Motiram, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o Dudapole (Jaspuriya), Hindaun City, Lohchoda,
Karauli.
57. Bablesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Hira Lal Saini, Aged About
30 Years, R/o Village Ata, Post Ata District Karauli.
58. Harsh Gupta S/o Shri Mohan Lal Gupta, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Durga Takij Ki Gali, Chhat Pada, Karauli,
District Karauli.
59. Ajeet Kumar Jatav S/o Shri Ramesh Chand Jatav, Aged
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (13 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
About 28 Years, R/o Mandrayal Road, Shubash Nagar,
Karauli(Rural) District Karauli
60. Abdesh Singh Jadaun S/o Shri Mukesh Singh Jadaun,
Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kota Chabar, Karauli, District
Karauli.
61. Akash Agrawal S/o Shri Chouthi Agrawal, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Jatav Basti, Indra Colony, Karauli.
62. Kunal Chove S/o Shri Surendra Kumar, Aged About 28
Years, R/o New Brahampuri Colony, Mandwra Road,
Karauli. District Karauli.
63. Sonu Prajapat S/o Shri Pappu Lal Prajapat, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Saimarda, Sapotra, Karauli.
64. Manish Saini S/o Shri Dinesh Kumar Saini, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Panday Ka Kua Puliya Ke Pass, Karauli, District
Karauli.
65. Kaushal Sharma S/o Shri Madhu Sudan Sharma, Gadholi,
Karauli, District Karauli.
66. Bharat Singh Saini S/o Shri Girraj Saini, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Paachana Caloni Ki Piche, Karauli, District
Karauli.
67. Narendra Kumar Jatav S/o Shri Ratan Lal, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Chandan Gaon, Post Shrimahaveerji, District
Karauli.
68. Sonu Jatav S/o Shri Shivsingh Jatav, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Village Chandan Gaon, Post Shrimahaveerji,
District Karauli.
69. Keshav Narayan S/o Shri Chainsukh Sain, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Indra Colony, Karauli, District Karauli.
70. Moin Khan S/o Shri Nasir Khan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o
Jahagir Ki Gali, Karauli, District Karauli.
71. Shyanu Sharma S/o Shri Janardhan Sharma, Aged About
26 Years, R/o Village And Post Needar, Mandrayal, District
Karauli.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary,
Department Of Medical And Health, Govt. Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (14 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
2. Director, Medical And Health Services, Behind Secretariat,
C Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302007.
3. Director, Rajasthan Medical Education Society (Rajmas),
Medical Education Bhavan Govind Marg Janta Coloney,
Jaipur.
4. Chief Medical Officer, General Hospital Karoli
5. Principal And Controller Government Medical College,
Karoli.
6. Deepak Enterprises, Through Authorized Signatory 209,
Temple Satyanarayan Ji Ka, Surjpol Bazar, Jaipur.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10233/2026
CNR: RJHC020545512026 | URN: CW / 22745U / 2026
1. Udit Sharma S/o Ramavtar Sharma, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Vpo Dhanawar, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa,
Rajasthan.
2. Pushpendra Singh Gurjar S/o Dharm Singh Gurjar, Aged
About 24 Years, R/o Rampura Gujran, Anantwara, Dausa,
Rajasthan.
3. Priya Dhakad D/o Sushil Dhakad, Aged About 24 Years,
R/o Nayavas, Weir, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
4. Ramkesh Saini S/o Bhagwan Sahay Saini, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Talai Wali Dhani, Peelwa Khurd, Post Dubbi,
District Dausa, Rajasthan.
5. Hitesh Saini S/o Ganga Ram Saini, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o Shree Rampuri Colony, Gupteshwar Road, Dausa,
Rajasthan.
6. Vishram Yogi S/o Shankar Lal Yogi, Aged About 25 Years,
R/o Village Khuri Khurd, Tehsil And District Dausa,
Rajasthan.
7. Lokesh Saini S/o Shri Mohar Saini, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Village Malipura, Post Talchiri, Tehsil Mahwa, District
Dausa, Rajasthan.
8. Raju Kumar Arsain S/o Mohan Singh Arsain, Aged About
28 Years, R/o Vpo Bidyari, Tehsil Bayana, District
Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
9. Narendra Kumar S/o Basram Bairwa, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Village Aachiwas, Post Bane Ka Barkhera,
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (15 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
Tehsil And District Dausa, Rajasthan.
10. Shivam Soni S/o Rajendra Kumar Soni, Aged About 24
Years, R/o D-55, Model Town, Near Bhagwati Gardem
Jamdoli, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical
Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,
Jaipur.
2. The Director, Rajasthan Medical Education Society
(Rajmes), Chikitsha Shiksha Bhawan, Govind Marg,
Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur.
3. The Principal And Controller, Pandit Nawal Kishore
Sharma Ayurvigyan College And Attached Hospital,,
Dausa.
4. The Principal, Govt. Medical College, Dausa.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad with Mr. S.M.
Umar Alam
Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma
Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir
Khan and Ms. Kavita Sharma
Mr. Abhinav Srivastav, Ms. Kritika
Rajawat, Adv. Manasirla Sharma,
Mr. Ayush Bishnoi
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with
Mr. Yashwant Singh
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
24/07/2026
1.The present writ petitions have been filed aggrieved of
orders dated 29.05.2026 (Annexure-10) and 01.06.2026
(Annexure-7) (in SBCWP Nos.10216/2026 & 10230/2026,
respectively) whereby the services of the petitioners who had
been working as 'Lab Technician' through a placement agency,
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (16 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
have been sought to be terminated and of orders dated
27.05.2026 (in SBCWP No. 10233/2026) whereby the persons
selected in terms of the Rajasthan Contractual Hiring Civil Posts
Rules, 2022 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules of 2022') have been
accorded appointments.
2.This Court in Ravi Chahar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.;
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10325/2026 (decided on
14.07.2026) has already taken a view that after the recruitment
process in terms of Rules of 2022 having been completed, the
earlier employees working through the placement agency would
have no right to continue. In Ravi Chahar (supra), this Court,
while dealing with the said issue held as under:
"6.Admittedly, Rules of 2022 were brought into effect
from 11.01.2022. As per the purpose and intent of the
said rules, they were framed and implemented in
pursuance to a policy decision of the State to enter into a
direct engagement with the employees and remove the
placement agencies in between. Vide the said rules, the
employment was to be made directly by the State
through regular recruitment process, on contract basis.
Further, the Rules of 2022 have not been assailed in the
present writ petition. Furthermore, requisition dated
13.05.2022 whereby the posts were created and
sanctioned for all the Government Medical Colleges as
well as the RajMES Society, has also not been laid a
challenge to in the present petition.
7.In view of the above, this Court is of the considered
opinion that the petitioners have no right to claim
extension as a matter of right as firstly, the
administrative decision of the State whereby the Rules of
2022 were promulgated having not been challenged, no
finding qua the said rules can be recorded by this Court.
Secondly, the action taken by the State in terms of the
[2026:RJ-JP:28745] (17 of 17) [CW-10216/2026]
Rules of 2022 being not impugned, the appointments
made in terms of the said rules cannot be termed to be
bad. Thirdly, even as per the petitioners, they were
accorded appointment with a specific condition that the
same was being granted till the regularly selected
candidates in terms of the Rules of 2022 are appointed.
The same having been accepted by the petitioners, they
cannot now turn up and say that they are entitled for
extension of their services or not to be replaced by the
persons appointed in terms of Rules of 2022.
8.No case of interference is made out and the present
writ petition is hence, dismissed."
3.Counsel for the petitioners however submitted that the
respondent-Authorities are under the process to fill up the
remaining vacancies again through a placement agency. However,
no document to substantiate the said fact has been placed on
record.
4.In view of the above, no case for interference is made out at
this stage. The writ petitions are disposed of.
5.However, if the respondent-Authorities undertake any fresh
process to fill up the remaining vacancies again through any
placement agency, the petitioners shall be at liberty to approach
afresh before the Court.
6.Stay applications and all pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(REKHA BORANA),J
21 to 23/ARVIND
In a significant ruling concerning contract employment, the Rajasthan High Court Writ Petition (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10216/2026, along with connected petitions Nos. 10230/2026 and 10233/2026) addressed the termination of services for 'Lab Technicians' who were initially engaged through placement agencies. This crucial decision, focusing on the implications of the Contractual Hiring Civil Posts Rules, 2022, is now available for in-depth review on CaseOn, offering legal professionals and students comprehensive insights into its ramifications.
The petitioners in these cases were 'Lab Technicians' whose services had been procured through various placement agencies. They challenged the orders dated 29.05.2026 and 01.06.2026, which effectively terminated their employment. The reason for their termination was the implementation of the Rajasthan Contractual Hiring Civil Posts Rules, 2022, which led to new appointments. The petitioners sought to challenge both their termination and the subsequent appointments made under these new rules.
These rules, which became effective from January 11, 2022, were established as a policy decision by the State. Their primary objective was to transition from indirect employment through placement agencies to a system of direct contractual engagement by the State. Under these new rules, employment was to be facilitated through a regular recruitment process, albeit on a contract basis.
A critical point noted by the court was that the petitioners did not challenge the validity or promulgation of the Rules of 2022 themselves. Furthermore, the requisition dated 13.05.2022, which created and sanctioned new posts for all Government Medical Colleges and the RajMES Society, also remained unchallenged by the petitioners.
The High Court relied on its own previous judgment in *Ravi Chahar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.* (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10325/2026, decided on 14.07.2026). This precedent had already established that once a recruitment process under the Rules of 2022 is finalized and new candidates are appointed, the previous employees, who were engaged through placement agencies, lose any inherent right to continue their employment.
The court meticulously examined the situation, noting that the Rules of 2022 were introduced with a clear intent: to streamline contractual employment by moving away from third-party placement agencies. Since these rules, and the subsequent requisition for posts, were not challenged by the petitioners, their legal standing was deemed valid in the context of this case.
Crucially, the court highlighted that the petitioners' original appointments through placement agencies came with an explicit condition. Their services were temporary and contingent upon the appointment of regularly selected candidates under the Rules of 2022. By accepting these terms of engagement, the petitioners were bound by them. Consequently, they could not later claim a right to service extension or argue against being replaced by those appointed under the new, direct contractual framework. For legal professionals seeking swift insights into complex rulings like this Rajasthan High Court Writ Petition, CaseOn.in's 2-minute audio briefs offer an invaluable tool for quick analysis and understanding, helping to distil the essence of such judgments efficiently.
The court ultimately found no grounds for judicial interference. It reasoned that since the Rules of 2022 were not impugned, the appointments made in accordance with those rules could not be considered unlawful. Although the petitioners' counsel submitted that the respondent-authorities were in the process of filling remaining vacancies through placement agencies, no documentary evidence was provided to substantiate this claim, leaving the court with no basis to intervene on that ground.
Based on its analysis, the Rajasthan High Court dismissed the writ petitions. The court unequivocally stated that no case for interference had been made out at that stage. However, it did grant a conditional liberty to the petitioners: if the respondent-authorities were to initiate any *fresh* process to fill *remaining* vacancies through a placement agency, the petitioners would then be at liberty to approach the court again. All associated stay applications and other pending applications were also disposed of.
This judgment serves as a pivotal reference for understanding the dynamics of contractual employment in government sectors, especially during policy shifts. For lawyers, it underscores the importance of challenging administrative rules at the appropriate time if they are deemed problematic, and the implications of terms and conditions accepted by clients. For law students, it provides a practical example of the IRAC method in action, demonstrating how courts interpret and apply statutory rules and precedents to specific factual matrices, particularly concerning employment law and administrative decisions. It highlights the principle that acceptance of specific service conditions can restrict future claims of right to continuation, and how new, unchallenged rules can effectively supersede prior, temporary arrangements.
All information provided in this analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should consult with a qualified legal professional for advice pertaining to their specific circumstances.
Login with google
Legal Notes
Add a Note....