As per case facts, plaintiffs filed a suit seeking declaration of title or partition of half share in house property, claiming title through A.G. Krishna Murthy, who allegedly sold them ... the property and was an adopted son. Defendants contested, asserting the property devolved to them via a Will from Akuthota Lakshmamma and disputed the adoption and sales. The trial court decreed for the plaintiffs, but the first appellate court modified it, granting plaintiffs a half share by partition. Aggrieved, the defendants initiated a second appeal. The central legal questions were whether the lower courts were justified in accepting A.G. Krishna Murthy's adoption without re-examination, whether their findings were perverse, and if the suit was barred by limitation. Finally, the Court affirmed that A.G. Krishna Murthy's adoption was conclusively established in an earlier judgment, which the testatrix of the Will never challenged, thus validating his half share and subsequent sale to the plaintiffs. The suit for partition was also found to be within the limitation period as the defendants' rights accrued much later. The Court found no substantial question of law for further determination, upholding the first appellate court's decision.