As per case facts, appellants, originally appointed as Shiksha Karmis under the Panchayat Department, sought Kramonnati Vetanman (time-bound pay scale) benefits under a State Government circular meant for regular Assistant ... Teachers of the School Education Department. Their writ petition for these benefits was dismissed by a Single Judge, leading to this appeal. They also claimed parity with another case, Smt. Sona Sahu. The question arose whether Shiksha Karmis, who were initially under the Panchayat Department and later absorbed into the School Education Department, were entitled to the time-bound pay scale benefits applicable to regular State Government Assistant Teachers, particularly under a circular issued prior to their absorption into state service. Finally, the High Court held that the circular relied upon applied only to regular State Government employees, and the Shiksha Karmis, being under the Panchayat Department before their absorption, could not claim the same benefits. Their service conditions were governed by Panchayat rules, making them distinct from the state government employees to whom the circular applied. The court also clarified that the case of Smt. Sona Sahu was distinguishable due to its peculiar facts and the specific circulars applicable to her situation, and hence, no parity could be claimed. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Single Judge's decision.