As per case facts, the accused allegedly followed and threatened the victim, then trespassed into her house on one occasion and committed rape. Later, he threatened and kidnapped her from ... school, taking her to various locations for two days, and repeatedly committed rape. The trial court convicted him under IPC and POCSO Act. The appellant appealed, asserting the prosecution failed to prove the victim's age as minor, and medical evidence didn't support rape. He also contended the victim willingly accompanied him. The question arose whether the prosecution convincingly proved rape, kidnapping, criminal intimidation, and aggravated penetrative sexual assault, considering the victim's alleged voluntariness and absent medical corroboration. Finally, the High Court found the prosecution failed to establish rape due to insufficient evidence, no seminal stains or external injuries, and concluded the victim voluntarily left school, unsupported by coercion or threat. Thus, the court acquitted the accused of all charges, reversing the trial court's conviction.