As per case facts, petitioners, primarily teachers, challenged a notification directing them to perform Census duty post-class hours or on weekends, arguing it would impede their teaching duties and personal ...
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
Present:
The Hon’ble Justice Krishna Rao
WPA 20480 of 2026
Ankan Sarkar & Ors.
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
For the petitioner : Mr. Subir Sanyal, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Dwarikanath Mukherjee
Mr. Ratul Biswas
Mr. Durlav De
For the State : Mr. Surajit Nath Mitra, Ld. AG
Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee
Mr. Partha Banerjee
Mr. Swarvanu Saha
For the Union of India : Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Trivedi, Ld.ASGI
Mr. Rajendra Kumar Gupta
Mr. Anish Kumar Mukherjee
With
WPA 21277 of 2026
Anup Kumar Sahoo & Ors.
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
For the petitioner : Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya,
Sr. Adv.
Mr. Firdous Samim
Ms. Gopa Biswas
Ms. Salini Bhattacharjee
Mr. Mainak Ghosal
Mr. Md. Imzamul Islam
Ms. Ayush Majumder
Mr. Rajosik Dutta
2
For the State : Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee
Mr. Swarvanu Saha
For the Union of India : Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Trivedi, Ld. ASG
Mr. Sukanta Chakrabarty
Mr. Arijit Mazumdar
With
WPA 21968 of 2026
All Bengal Teachers’ Association & Ors.
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
With
WPA 21969 of 2026
All Bengal Primay Teachers’ Association & Ors.
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
For the petitioner : Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Sr.
Adv.
Mr. Samim Ahammed
Mr. Arka Maiti
Ms. Gulsanwara Pervin
For the State : Mr. Srijib Chakraborty
Mr. Atreya Chakraborty
For the Union of India : Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Trivedi, Ld.ASGI
Mr. Rajendra Kumar Gupta
Mr. Anish Kumar Mukherjee
3
KRISHNA RAO, J.:
1. In all writ applications, the petitioners have challenged the
notification dated August 3, 2026 wherein the Joint Director
of School Education, West Bengal directed the
Chairman/Secretary of the District Primary School Council of
all districts, K.P.S.C. and Siliguri P.S.C. as well as the District
Inspector of Schools (P.E.) that Census work should be done
in such a way that academic activities in the school are not
affected, the teachers may perform Census activities post
class hours or during the weekends.
2. During the pendency of the writ applications, the learned
Advocate General has handed over the Memo No. 1154(46) –
Sc/Apt dated August 19, 2026 issued by the Joint Director of
School Education, West Bengal addressed to the
Chairman/Secretary of the District Primary School Council of
all districts K.P.S.C. and Siliguri P.S.C. as well as the District
Inspector of Schools (P.E.) intimating that the Commissioner
of School Education, West Bengal vide Memo dated August
19, 2026 requested the Senior Special Secretary, Home and
Hill Department, West Bengal to utilize the teachers deployed
Heard on :
11.08.2026, 14.08.2026, 18.08.2026 &
19.08.2026
Judgement on : 21.08.2025
4
to Census duty keeping in mind that the academic interest of
the students of the schools are not affected adversely and it
was further requested to follow the instructions of the Census
authority and treat the office Memo No. 708(46)-Sc/P dated
August 3, 2026 as withdrawn.
3. Learned Advocate General by referring the letter dated August
19, 2026 and referring the prayer made by the petitioners in
their respective writ petitions submits that the grievances of
the petitioners have been considered by the authorities and
have withdrawn the impugned memo dated August 3, 2026.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that
though the respondent authorities have withdrawn the memo
dated August 3, 2026 but it has not been made clear whether
the duty of Census assigned to the teachers has to go for the
Census duty by leaving the classes or whether the teachers
shall continue with their teaching duties without going to the
Census work.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners have referred
the notification dated May 26, 2026 wherein the State
Government declares that the house listing operation of the
Census of India, 2027 shall take place between August 16,
2026 and September 14, 2026 in the State of West Bengal
5
during a period of 30 days with an option for self-enumeration
shall be conducted in 15 days time period between August 1,
2026 and August 15, 2026 just before the start of house to
house listing operation.
6. By referring the said notification, learned counsel appearing
for the petitioners submits that the Census is to be completed
within a period of one month and if the petitioners have been
allotted the work of Census on the other hand, the State
authority will direct the petitioners to continue with their
teaching job in addition to the work allotted to the petitioners
for Census of India, 2027, the petitioners would not be in a
position to complete the said work and to execute the work of
Census.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the
many of the petitioners who are working as a teacher are
residing far away from their place of posting, the school
timing is 10.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. and the journey hours of
one side is about one and half to two hours. If the petitioners
are directed to do the Census work after the school time, it is
not possible for the petitioners to do the Census work. It is
the further contention of the petitioners that Saturday is also
working day and only the Sunday is the holiday and it is not
6
possible for the petitioners to do the Census work on Sunday
which is the only weekly off of the petitioners.
8. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also placed on record
the schedule fixed by the Charge Officer for Census duty of
some places wherein it reveals that the Census duty starts
from August 16, 2026 from 9.00 a.m. till 4.00 p.m. and if the
Census duty is allotted to the petitioners from 9.00 a.m. to
4.00 p.m., it is not possible for the petitioners to perform their
duty as teachers in their respective schools.
9. The petitioners have also placed on record with regard to the
order issued by the Block Development Officer and Charge
Officer, Census-2027, Sonapur Development Block, South 24
Parganas, dated August 18, 2026 wherein the Charge Officer
by referring Sections 15A and 15B of the Census Act, 1948
has requested all the authorities to instruct the respective
HMs/TICs and Head of the Officers to treat the period during
which the concerned staff perform the Census duties as “ON
DUTY” and extend full cooperation by reliving the deployed
personnel whenever required and ensure that no service
related disability, administrative inconvenience or obstruction
is caused in the discharge of their Census responsibilities.
7
10. Learned counsel for the petitioners have also draws attention
of this Court that one of the Charge Officer, Ward no. 108 had
issued the show-cause notice to one of the petitioner for not
attending the Census duty from August 16, 2026. By
referring the said show -cause notice, learned counsel
appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have
filed the present writ applications on August 7, 2026 and this
Court has firstly taken up the matter on August 11, 2026 and
as per the prayer made by the learned counsel for the
respondents, this Court has adjourned the matter till August
14, 2026. On August 14, 2026, the respondents have further
prayed for time to take instruction from the authorities
accordingly, this Court has fixed the maters on August 18,
2026.
11. On August 18, 2026 also the respondents have taken time for
further instruction and today the respondent authorities have
produced the memo dated August 19, 2026 wherein the
authorities have withdrawn the impugned notice dated
August 3, 2026. But in spite of the same knowing that the
petitioners have filed the writ applications and the same are
pending before this Court and the respondents have taken
time for instruction but the Charge Officer had issued show-
8
cause notice to the petitioner for not attending the Census
duty.
12. Learned counsel for the respondents has relied upon the
judgment in the case of Election Commission of India vs.
St. Mary’s School & Ors. Reported in (2008) 2 SCC 390
and submits that in the said case the Hon‟ble Supreme Court
has categorically held that as far as possible teachers would
be put on electoral roll revision works on holidays, non -
teaching days and non-teaching hours, whereas non-teaching
staff be put on the duty any time. The Hon‟ble Supreme
Court has directed that all the teaching staff shall be put on
the duties of roll revisions and election works on holidays and
non-teaching days. Teachers should not ordinarily be put on
duty on teaching days and within teaching hours. Non -
teaching staff, however, may be put on such duties on any
day or at any time, if permissible in law.
13. By referring the said judgment, learned advocate appearing
for the respondent authorities submits that the petitioners
who are working as a teacher can do the Census work after
the school hours and during the holidays.
14. Learned counsel for the respondents further relied upon the
judgment in the case of U.P. Madhyamic Shikshak Sang h
9
though its Secretary and another vs. Union of India
though its Secretary, Home, New Delhi and others
reported in 2010 SCC OnLine All 1107 and submits that
the Hon‟ble Division Bench of Allahabad High Court has held
that it cannot be hold and say that the teachers cannot be
taken for the purpose of rendering census work which is
required for national importance, therefore, striking the
balance between the two parts, the first part is the training
and the same can be made within summer vacation of the
year and fixed for three days only and for the final work for
the purpose of completion of census work are concerned, for
the sake of equity, the Central and the State authorities to fix
a programme either preponing the days or otherwise so that
the duties can be discharged by such teachers during
vocational period which is forthcoming or in the periods when
the institutions are closed inclusive of holidays unless they
are compelled to accept their duty in any working day and if
such work are taken in the working days then in that case the
authorities will take into account the strength of the teachers
of the individual institutions so that there should not by any
difficulty in imparting education to the students.
10
15. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties perused
the materials on record.
16. Primarily the petitioners are aggrieved with the impugned
order dated August 3, 2026 wherein the Joint Director of
School Education, West Bengal has directed the school
authorities that; “As directed it is to inform him that Census
work should be done in such a way that academic activities in
the school are not affected. The teacher may perform census
activities post class hours or during the weekends.”
Subsequently, on August 19, 2026 the Joint Director of
School Education, West Bengal has withdrawn the impu gned
notice dated August 3, 2026.
17. The Charge Officer issued orders for appointment of some of
the petitioners as Enumerator for Census 2027 – Houselisting
and Housing Census and City Census Officer issued an order
for deployment of some of the petitioners as Supervisors for
Census 2027 - Houselisting and Housing Census. In the said
orders, there is no mentioning of any timing of Houselising
and Housing Census, 2027
18. Sections 15A and 15B of the Census Act, 1948 reads as
follows:
11
“15A. No member of the census staff shall suffer any
disability in service by reason of his being on census
duty and the period spent by him on such census duty
shall be deemed to be the duty under his lending
employer and any duty performed under this Act shall
not in any manner affect the right of promotion or
other advancement in his original service.
15B. No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding
shall lie against the Census Commissioner or any
Director of Census Operations or any census-officer or
any member of the census staff for anything which is
in good faith done or intended to be done under this
act or the rules made thereunder.”
19. The petitioners have relied upon several memorandums
issued by the several States wherein it is mentioned that
a) all personnel drafted for Census duty (field trainers,
supervisors and enumerators) must be relieved from
their regular office duties to enable them to report to
their respective training centers in their respective
batches,
b) the period of absence shall be treated as „ON DUTY‟
for all purposes.
No separate attendance in the parent department is
required during this period.
Parent departments shall not mark these officials as
absent.
12
20. Many Charge Officers have issued orders directing the
concerned authorities including the school authorities to
provide necessary instructions to the respective HMs/TICs
and the Head of the Offices to treat the period during which
the concerned staff performed the Census duty as „ON DUTY‟
and extend full cooperation by relieving the deployed
personnel whenever required and ensure that no service
related disability, administrative convenience or obstruction is
caused in discharge of their Census responsibilities.
21. By a letter dated August 19, 2026, the Joint Director of
School Education requested the School Authorities of West
Bengal to utilize the teachers deployed to Census duty
keeping in mind that the academic interest of the students of
schools are not affected adversely. In the case of St. Mary’s
School (supra), the Hon‟ble Supreme Court held that:
“33. We would, however, notice that the Election
Commission before us also categorically stated that
as far as possible teachers would be put on
electoral roll revision works on holidays, non-
teaching days and non-teaching hours; whereas
non-teaching staff be put on duty any time. We,
therefore, direct that all teaching staff shall be put
on the duties of roll revisions and election works on
holidays and non-teaching days. Teachers should
13
not ordinarily be put on duty on teaching days and
within teaching hours. Non-teaching staff, however,
may be put on such duties on any day or at any
time, if permissible in law.”
22. In the case of U.P. Madhyamic Shikshak Sang h though its
Secretary and another (supra)¸ the Hon‟ble Division Bench
of Allahabad High Court held that:
“As against such view of the Supreme Court, we
can not hold and say that Teachers cannot be taken
for the purpose of rendering census work which is
required for national importance, therefore, striking
the balance between the two parts, we find that the
first part is the training and the same can be made
within summer vacation of the year and fixed for
three days only, we do not find any difficulty for the
Teachers in attending such training. So far as
indexing and final work for the purpose of
completion of census work are concerned, for the
sake of equity, we direct the Central and State
authorities to fix a programme either preponing the
dates or otherwise so that the duties can be
discharged by such Teachers during vocational
period which is forthcoming or in the periods when
the institutions are closed inclusive of holidays
unless they are compelled to accept their duty in
any working day and if such work are taken in the
working days then in that case the authorities will
take into account the strength of the Teachers of the
14
individual institutions so that there should not be
any difficulty in imparting education to the
students.”
23. In the present case, as per the notification issued by the
Government of West Bengal, the Census work is to be
completed in between August 16, 2026 to September 14,
2026, i.e., within 30 days. The Census is required to be done
for national interest, nobody can avoid such type of work
irrespective of their imparting education, particularly they are
receiving salary from the public exchequer. This Court wanted
to strike a balance between two contingencies, i.e., one is
imparting education and another is with regard to assistance
in the Census work by the teachers.
24. The intention of the State Government is also that while
deploying the teachers to Census duty, to keep in mind that
the academic interest of the students of schools are not
affected adversely.
25. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present cases,
the writ petitions are disposed of with the following
directions:-
i) The Director of Census Operations and the Charge
Officer, if they intending to take the service of the
15
petitioners who are working as a teacher, they shall
specify the date, time and place of the Census work
to be executed by the petitioners to the head of the
institution of the petitioners and if any request is
received by the head of the institution, the head of
the schools shall make necessary arrangements to
allow the petitioners to go for the Census work and
to make necessary alternative arrangements with the
available teachers in their respective schools so that
education of the students shall not be affected.
ii) If the teachers are deputed for Census duty, they
shall be treated as “On Duty” in terms of the Section
15A of the Census Act.
iii) If the Census Authorities/School Authorities depute
any teachers for Census work, no teachers shall
deny to perform their Census work assigned to them.
26. In view of the above, the writ petitions being WPA 20480 of
2026, WPA 21277 of 2026, WPA 21968 of 2026 and WPA
21969 of 2026 stand disposed of.
16
27. Urgent Xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be
given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary
formalities.
(Krishna Rao, J.)
Sourav Banerjee/
Suvayan Ghosh/
Sudipta Gayen
A.R. (Court)
In a significant decision that strikes a crucial balance between civic responsibility and educational continuity, the Teacher Census Duty Calcutta High Court has addressed the contentious issue of deploying teachers for census operations. This ruling, pertaining to several writ petitions, including WPA 20480 of 2026 and WPA 21277 of 2026, highlights the ongoing debate surrounding Academic Interests vs. National Duty. These pivotal judgments are readily accessible on CaseOn, providing a comprehensive legal resource for practitioners and scholars alike.
The central legal question before the Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao was whether teachers could be mandated to perform Census duty during regular school hours, potentially disrupting academic activities, or if such duties should primarily be carried out during non-teaching periods, holidays, or post-class hours. Petitioners, largely teachers and teacher associations, challenged a notification that directed them to conduct census work post-class hours or during weekends, arguing its impracticality and the potential strain on their primary teaching responsibilities.
The Court's decision was informed by a careful consideration of several legal provisions and judicial precedents:
Initially, a notification dated August 3, 2026, directed school authorities to ensure census work was done without affecting academic activities, suggesting teachers perform duties post-class or during weekends. This was subsequently withdrawn on August 19, 2026, by Memo No. 1154(46)-Sc/Apt.
Sections 15A and 15B of the Census Act are critical. Section 15A ensures that census staff do not suffer service disability and that the period spent on duty is treated as 'on duty' by their lending employer. Section 15B protects census officers from legal proceedings for actions taken in good faith.
The judgment in Election Commission of India vs. St. Mary's School & Ors. (2008) 2 SCC 390, which dealt with electoral roll revision, established that teachers should, as far as possible, be assigned such duties on holidays, non-teaching days, and non-teaching hours. Non-teaching staff, however, could be deployed at any time.
The Allahabad High Court in U.P. Madhyamic Shikshak Sangh though its Secretary and another vs. Union of India though its Secretary, Home, New Delhi and others (2010 SCC OnLine All 1107) recognized the national importance of census work. It suggested that training could occur during summer vacations and final work during vocational periods or holidays. If compelled during working days, authorities should consider the strength of teachers to avoid educational disruption.
Various state memorandums also emphasized relieving personnel drafted for census duty from regular office duties, treating the absence as 'ON DUTY,' and ensuring no service-related disability.
The petitioners highlighted significant practical difficulties: many reside far from their schools, school hours are 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., and travel can add two hours each way. With Saturdays often being working days, Sunday is their only weekly off, making it difficult to perform census duties, especially when census schedules (like 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) directly clash with school timings. The Court noted instances where Charge Officers issued show-cause notices to teachers for not attending census duty, even while writ petitions were pending.
The Court acknowledged the withdrawal of the initial problematic memo but stressed the need for clarity on how census duties would be performed without impacting teaching. It underscored that while census work is of national importance and teachers, as public servants, cannot entirely avoid it, the academic interests of students must not be adversely affected. The State Government's stated intention was also to safeguard student education while deploying teachers for census duty.
The judgments from the Supreme Court and Allahabad High Court served as crucial guiding lights, emphasizing that such national duties should, whenever possible, be scheduled outside teaching hours or during holidays, and if conducted during working days, careful consideration must be given to minimizing educational disruption. This is where CaseOn.in's 2-minute audio briefs become invaluable, offering legal professionals swift analysis of such nuanced rulings and their practical implications.
The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petitions with clear, pragmatic directions aimed at striking the necessary balance:
The judgment effectively resolves the conflict between teachers' primary duty to educate and their obligation to perform national duties like the Census. By withdrawing the initial directive and issuing comprehensive new guidelines, the Calcutta High Court has ensured that while teachers participate in the vital Census of India 2027, the academic calendar and student learning are protected through planned deployments, alternative arrangements, and clear 'on duty' status for those involved. The decision underscores the importance of inter-departmental coordination to achieve national goals without compromising essential public services.
This judgment offers critical insights for legal professionals and students:
Disclaimer: All information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are advised to consult with a qualified legal professional for advice on specific legal issues.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....