As per case facts, disputes from work contracts led to arbitration awards, which were initially challenged, leading to a fresh arbitration. After the new award was made, objections were filed, ... prompting the respondent to argue these objections were time-barred under the Limitation Act. The question arose whether the limitation period for challenging an arbitration award commenced merely upon an office report noting the award's submission, or only after formal notice of the award's filing in court was given to the parties. Finally, the Supreme Court ruled that an office report is not equivalent to formal notice required by Article 119(b) of the Limitation Act. Since no formal notice was directed by the court or issued by the Registry, the limitation period had not commenced, and thus, the objections were not time-barred. The Court then proceeded to review the award's merits, setting aside certain claims for sales tax and loss of profit due to lack of evidence, while upholding or modifying others, and confirming the remainder of the award.