Tax Appeal, Sikkim High Court, Central Goods and Services Tax, Intas Pharma, Supreme Court decision, dismissed, A. Muhamed Mustaque, Meenakshi Madan Rai
 19 Feb, 2026
Listen in 00:34 mins | Read in 01:30 mins
EN
HI

Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services Tax And Central Excise Vs. M/S Intas Pharma Ltd.

  Sikkim High Court Tax App. No.04 of 2025
Link copied!

Case Background

As per case facts, the Deputy Solicitor General of India informed the court that the issue in this appeal had already been decided against the Appellant in Civil Appeal Diary ...

Bench

Applied Acts & Sections

No Acts & Articles mentioned in this case

Hello! How can I help you? 😊
Disclaimer: We do not store your data.
Document Text Version

COURT NO.1

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK

Record of Proceedings

Page-1 of 3

Tax App. No.04 of 2025

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND

SERVICES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE APPELLANT (S)

VERSUS

M/S INTAS PHARMA LTD. RESPONDENT (S)

For Appellant : Ms. Sangita Pradhan, Deputy Solicitor General of

India with Ms. Sittal Balmiki and Ms. Natasha

Pradhan, Advocates.

For Respondent : Mr. Deepro Sen(through V.C.),

Ms. Gita Bista and Mr. Dipendra Chettri, Advocates.

Date: 19/02/2026

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, CHIEF JUSTICE

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE

O R D E R: (per the Hon’ble, the Chief Justice)

It is submitted by the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India that the

issue involved in the present Appeal has already been decided against the

Appellant herein in Civil Appeal Diary No(s).66744/2025 of the Hon’ble Supreme

Court of India.

In light of the binding decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, this Appeal

stands dismissed as covered against the Appellant.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

(Meenakshi Madan Rai) (A. Muhamed Mustaque)

Judge Chief Justice

ami/sdl

Reference cases

Description

Legal Notes

Add a Note....