Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
You have successfully created your account,
now you can explore our platform with Lifetime Free Plan
Income Tax Appeal, Section 197, TDS Certificate, Assessment Year, Prospective Application, Section 201, Default, Interest, National Highways Authority of India, Madhya Pradesh High Court
06 Mar, 2026
Listen in 01:10 mins | Read in 18:00 mins
EN
HI
Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds Vs. Project Director National Highways Authority Of India Piu Narsinghpur
As per case facts, the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Bhopal, challenged ITAT orders for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. The respondent, National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), made payments
...to a contractor, deducting tax at marginal rates based on Section 197(1) orders. However, the Assessing Officer noticed payments were made without a valid lower deduction certificate in force, leading to a default assessment and interest levy. The AO and CIT argued that the Section 197 certificate applied prospectively from its issuance date, while the ITAT ruled that the deductor was not in default. The question arose whether the benefit of a Section 197 certificate applies from its issuance date or covers the entire assessment year, and if the assessee deductor could be held in default under Section 201(1) and 201(1A) for payments made before the certificate's issuance. Finally, the High Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the ITAT's decision. It held that Section 197 certificates are valid for the entire financial year. Thus, the assessee cannot be deemed in default for not deducting tax at source, and the deletion of interest levied under Section 201(1A) was justified as the certificate's effect covers the whole assessment year.
Bench
Applied Acts & Sections
No Acts & Articles mentioned in this case
Source & Integrity Notice
This is a faithful reproduction of the official record from the e-Courts Services portal, extracted for research.
To ensure "Contextual Integrity," all AI insights must be cross-referenced with the official PDF,
which remains the sole authoritative version for judicial purposes.
This platform provides research aids, not legal advice; verify all content against the official Court Registry before legal use.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....