As per case facts, the plaintiff filed a partition suit claiming to be the son of late D. Hanuma Reddy from his second wife. The defendants, Hanuma Reddy's first wife ... and daughters, disputed his paternity and the alleged second marriage. The trial court dismissed the suit, leading the plaintiff to appeal. During the appeal, the plaintiff sought to introduce additional documents as evidence and requested a DNA test of the defendants to establish his biological connection. The question arose whether the plaintiff proved his paternity, was entitled to a share in the properties, and if the interlocutory applications for additional evidence and DNA test were justifiable. Finally, the Court found the plaintiff failed to prove his paternity and the alleged marriage. The additional evidence was deemed insufficient or improperly sought, and the DNA test request was denied due to lack of a strong prima facie case and voluntary consent. Thus, the trial court's dismissal of the partition suit was upheld, and the interlocutory applications were dismissed.