Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
The High Court by the impugned judgment upheldAct, 2018, except to the extent of quantum ofreservation provided under Section 4(1)(a), 4(1)(b)over and above 12% and 13% respectively asrecommended by Maharashtra
...State Backward ClassCommission. The writ petitions challenging theOrdinance XIII and XIV of 2014 as well as Act, 2014were dismissed as having become infructuous. Fewwrit petitions were also allowed and few detaggedand other writ petitions have been disposed of.
Bench
Applied Acts & Sections
No Acts & Articles mentioned in this case
Source & Integrity Notice
This is a faithful reproduction of the official record from the e-Courts Services portal, extracted for research.
To ensure "Contextual Integrity," all AI insights must be cross-referenced with the official PDF,
which remains the sole authoritative version for judicial purposes.
This platform provides research aids, not legal advice; verify all content against the official Court Registry before legal use.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....