As per case facts, a borrower defaulted on a loan, leading the bank to initiate SARFAESI proceedings and attach property. During DRT proceedings, the borrower entered into a sale agreement ... for a flat without bank or Tribunal permission. The DRT subsequently declared this transaction void. Despite this, the agreement holder filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the e-auction of the flat, which had already concluded with the appellant as the successful bidder. The High Court allowed the writ petition, prompting the auction purchaser to appeal to the Supreme Court. The question arose whether the High Court erred in entertaining a writ petition challenging SARFAESI measures, especially when an alternative statutory remedy was available and the agreement to sale was declared void by the DRT. Finally, the Supreme Court quashed the High Court's judgment, holding that the High Court should not have entertained the writ petition given the alternative remedy and the void nature of the sale agreement. The appellant was directed to complete the payment and receive the sale certificate.