As per case facts, the Petitioner filed a Writ Application alleging gross irregularity in the final electoral roll for the Jalpaiguri Bar Association Booth for the 12th Bar Council Election. ... The Petitioner claimed voters' names appeared multiple times across different Bar Associations, violating the one-person, one-vote principle. The Respondent No. 1 admitted the irregularity but cited practical difficulties and lack of consent for deletions, stating it was too late for corrections before the election. The question arose whether the High Court could interfere in the election process to rectify such admitted gross irregularities despite general judicial restraint in election matters. Finally, the High Court, relying on Supreme Court precedents, directed respondent nos. 1 to 3 to immediately take corrective measures, revise the final electoral roll by 2026-03-06, and ensure no voter casts more than one vote for a free, fair, and transparent election, asserting its duty to intervene against unjust executive action.