As per case facts, petitioners filed a writ petition seeking complete "Relied Upon Documents" and the quashing of a show cause notice issued under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act for ... retention of seized properties. They alleged that despite repeated requests, the Enforcement Directorate failed to provide all necessary documents in the required format, asserting a misrepresentation of facts. Petitioners expressed concern about lack of fair opportunity to respond before final arguments were scheduled. The question arose whether the Adjudicating Authority correctly served the documents electronically instead of the legally mandated bound paper book, thus impacting the petitioners' right to a complete defense. Finally, the High Court directed the Adjudicating Authority to first verify if the requested documents are "Relied Upon Documents" and, if not provided, order their supply within two weeks. Petitioners were given a chance to file a supplementary reply, and any aggrieved party could appeal the order on document supply under the statute.