Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
As per the case facts the original writ petitioners challenged Section a of the Delhi Land Reforms Act as unconstitutional arguing it violated fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution The
...appeal to the Supreme Court arose after the Delhi High Court dismissed their writ petition upholding the constitutionality of the provision The question arose whether Section a of the Delhi Land Reforms Act was unconstitutional specifically in light of its compatibility with various articles of the Constitution and the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act regarding agricultural land Finally the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal upholding the High Court's decision The Court found that Section of the Hindu Succession Act would operate in respect of succession to agricultural lands in the State of Himachal Pradesh and that Section of the Act before its omission made it clear that the Act's provisions would not apply to devolution of tenancy rights in agricultural holdings With the deletion of Section there is now no exception to the applicability of Section