As per the case facts, writ petitions challenged a State Act creating a separate entity for managing Gurdwaras, arguing it lacked legislative competence given past state reorganizations and existing central ... laws. A related appeal disputed the termination of an official's appointment under the challenged Act, noting no functions were performed due to a court stay and the term had expired. The question arose whether the State Act was constitutionally valid and if the appointment termination was justified given the circumstances. Finally, the Supreme Court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the validity of the State Act. It also dismissed the appeal regarding the appointment, stating that the official had no continuing claim as the term had ended and no duties were performed due to the stay.