As per case facts, a suit was filed for property declaration, challenging a sale deed, alleging the original owner died without a Will. The defendants, including Petitioners, initially did not ... deny the absence of a Will in their original written statement. Later, after an amended plaint, Petitioners filed an amended written statement introducing a Will plea and attempting to correct a typographical error from "contesting party" to "consenting party." Petitioners appealed the dismissal of their amendment application and the allowance of deletion of new pleas from their amended written statement. The question arose whether to allow amendment of the written statement to withdraw an admission about no Will and correct a typographical error, especially when the trial had commenced. Finally, the Court dismissed the challenge against deletion of new pleas. It partly allowed the amendment, permitting only the correction of 'contesting party' to 'consenting party' in para 9, but disallowed the withdrawal of the admission regarding the Will, finding it was not a typographical error and lacked due diligence.