As per case facts, the Petitioner, an ASI, was arrested for corruption, suspended, and dismissed from service after an inquiry found him guilty of demanding and accepting a bribe. His ... appeals were dismissed. He moved the High Court via Writ Petition, challenging the dismissal orders, arguing the SP lacked competence, District Magistrate approval was missing, he wasn't given a chance to comment on the inquiry report, the show cause notice proposed punishment, and his 32 years of service weren't considered. The question arose whether the dismissal was procedurally flawed. Finally, the High Court dismissed the Petition, holding that the SP was competent, DM approval is not needed for corruption, due opportunity was given, and a single act of corruption justifies dismissal, thus upholding the impugned Orders.