As per case facts, a family business dissolution led to disputes over asset partition between two groups, one relying on a partition deed (KBPP) and a Conciliation Award, the other ... challenging them. The Jegatheesan group alleged undue influence and misrepresentation for the KBPP and fabrication for the Award. Their suit challenging these documents was dismissed by lower courts at the threshold, leading to this appeal. The question arose whether this suit, raising serious allegations against the partition deed and conciliation award, should have been rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Finally, the Supreme Court ruled that the lower courts erred in dismissing the suit. It held that the distinct challenges to the KBPP and the Award, including allegations of fraud, were not foreclosed by earlier proceedings and required trial. The Court set aside the dismissal, restored the plaint, and allowed the suit to proceed, permitting a fresh arbitration if parties agree to disregard the contentious documents.