As per case facts, the writ petitioner sought salary and pension arrears, claiming entitlement prior to a specific policy. The initial Writ Petition ordered financial assistance calculation, upheld through subsequent ... appeals by the State, including before the Supreme Court. Due to non-compliance, a Contempt Petition was filed. The University calculated the dues, but the Petitioner disputed the pay scale used. The State appealed, arguing the Contempt Order exceeded the original Judgment's scope. The question arose whether the Single Judge, in Contempt proceedings, had exceeded jurisdiction or if the pay scale dispute could be addressed. Finally, the High Court found that the Single Judge did not exceed jurisdiction, as the directions were solely for compliance. It affirmed the calculated amount and stated that pay scale grievances should be pursued separately through an appropriate application, dismissing both appeals.