As per case facts, Petitioners alleged illegal dispossession from a marriage palace by private Respondents with police help, despite having rent deeds and commercial dealings since 2016. The private Respondents ... counter that rent deeds are forged, and an inquiry supported this. Petitioners initially filed a Civil Suit for injunction, which was dismissed on appeal due to lack of possession evidence, then withdrew it. A second Civil Suit for possession restoration and damages is now pending. Petitioners appealed to the High Court seeking a judicial inquiry, action against police, and immediate restoration of possession with compensation. The question arose whether the High Court should intervene under its writ jurisdiction when intricate and disputed questions of fact are involved, and similar relief is already sought in a pending civil suit. Finally, the High Court observed the cause of action and relief in the Writ Petition were similar to the pending Civil Suit. Given the disputed facts and prior judicial findings, the High Court declined to exercise its extraordinary powers under Article 226, dismissing the Writ Petition as not maintainable.