As per the case facts, a professor faced charges under a law against promoting enmity, based on content he posted on social media. A lower court had refused to dismiss ... the charges, leading to his appeal to the Supreme Court. He argued his post did not violate the law. The question arose whether the content shared by the appellant on his social media status amounted to an offense of promoting enmity between groups. Finally, the Supreme Court overturned the lower court's decision and dismissed the charges against the professor. It ruled that the content he shared was not intended to create discord or ill-will between different religious groups and did not undermine harmony. The Court underscored the importance of free speech rights and the need for law enforcement to understand these constitutional protections.