As per case facts, three review applications were filed by an LR of Jit Singh, seeking to reconsider a High Court judgment from 2019. These applications stemmed from earlier suits, ... including one for specific performance that was dismissed at all court levels, and another for possession where mesne profits were granted at the appellate stage. The applicant for review, previously a proforma respondent, contended that the High Court failed to adjudicate issues of fraud in a connected decree and mesne profits, citing an error apparent on the record. The respondent countered that most issues were conceded in the original appeal, mesne profits were addressed, and the specific performance suit had attained finality up to the Supreme Court. The question arose whether the High Court committed an error apparent on the face of the record by not adjudicating all issues, especially regarding fraud and mesne profits, considering the finality of prior judgments and the applicant's conduct. Finally, the High Court, adhering to the limited scope of review, found no error apparent on the record. It noted the specific performance claim's finality and the applicant's history of not contesting earlier proceedings or challenging final orders. Declaring the applications mala fide and an abuse of process, the court dismissed them with costs.