As per case facts, the third defendant appealed against a preliminary decree granting the plaintiff a 1/3 share in suit properties inherited from their mother. The third defendant relied on ... a Will executed by the mother in favor of her grandson (the third defendant). The plaintiff and first defendant contended that the second defendant (father of third defendant) was adopted out, losing inheritance rights, and that the Will was fabricated, citing the mother's poor health around its execution. The second defendant maintained he was not adopted and the Will was valid. The question arose whether the second defendant was legally adopted, affecting inheritance, and crucially, whether the Will was true, valid, and genuinely executed by the testatrix in a sound state of mind, dispelling suspicious circumstances. Finally, the Court found no conclusive proof of the second defendant's adoption. However, regarding the Will, due to the testatrix's severe illness and hospitalization just before its execution and her rapid demise, along with other inconsistencies, the Court concluded the Will was surrounded by insurmountable suspicious circumstances and was not proved. Thus, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the partition decree.