As per case facts, the Petitioner, a DLR Assistant with BDA since 1994, was among 113 workmen whose regularization was directed by a Labour Court Award in 2004. This Award ... was confirmed by the High Court and Supreme Court, attaining finality in 2010. Despite this, the Petitioner was disengaged in 2009 for alleged unauthorized absence. Although BDA's Authority resolved in 2010 to re-engage him and consider regularization, he was not reinstated. His regularization claim was later rejected by BDA in 2016, citing a 1997 Finance Department Resolution. The question arose whether the BDA could reject the Petitioner's regularization claim based on an administrative resolution, overriding a final judicial award, and whether his disengagement was lawful. Finally, the Court held that the Petitioner's disengagement was illegal and unjustified, and the Finance Department Resolution could not override the binding Labour Court Award. The Court directed his reinstatement from 2009, payment of back wages until 2010, and regularization as a Clerk (Junior Clerk) from 2010 with all consequential benefits and arrears within three months.