As per case facts, on 08.11.2001, the complainant reported her 15-year-old daughter missing, suspecting Khusi Ram. FIR was registered, and the victim was later found with Khusi Ram. Yunus and ... Jamshed were later added as accused. All appellants were convicted under Section 376(2)(g) IPC (Khusi Ram also for Section 506 IPC) by the trial court. The appeal challenged the conviction citing FIR delay, contradictions in the prosecutrix's statement, lack of corroboration, absence of injuries, and political implication. The question arose whether the conviction could be upheld solely on the prosecutrix's consistent testimony despite the defense's arguments. Finally, the High Court affirmed the conviction, finding the prosecutrix's testimony consistent and reliable. It stressed that minor discrepancies, delay, or absence of injuries do not negate a trustworthy victim's account, supported by FSL evidence, relying on established legal precedents.