As per case facts, plaintiffs alleged defendants committed fraud, took their money, and fraudulently executed a sale deed for the 2nd plaintiff's property using a Power Agent. They sought to ... declare the sale deed null and void and recover possession. Defendants contended the sale was legitimate and the suit was time-barred. The question arose whether the sale deed was invalid due to fraud, forgery, or lack of consideration, and if the suit was filed within limitation. Finally, the High Court dismissed the suit, finding no proof of fraud, forgery, or lack of consideration. It also ruled the suit was barred by limitation as it was not filed within three years of the sale deed's execution, and the plaintiffs' claim of delayed knowledge was unproven.