As per case facts, applicants sought bail after 34.452 kg of heroin was seized at the airport, leading to charges under the NDPS Act. They argued non-compliance with statutory provisions ... like Section 50 and 52A, long incarceration without trial, and that the seized substance was a mixture. The question arose whether the applicants, accused of possessing a commercial quantity of heroin, should be granted bail despite claims of procedural irregularities and long pre-trial detention, considering the stringent conditions for bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Finally, the court denied bail, finding strong prima facie evidence of conscious possession. It ruled that procedural lapses or delay in trial do not automatically entitle an accused to bail, especially given the serious nature and quantity of the contraband. The court emphasized that the conditions under Section 37 were not met, as there were no reasonable grounds to believe the applicants were not guilty.