As per case facts, the Appellant's property faced demolition orders after municipal authorities relied on an interim order from a High Court writ petition challenging new building rules. The Appellant, ... whose building became compliant under these new rules, sought to be impleaded and clarified the interim order in the High Court, but their applications were dismissed, stating they had no standing. The question arose whether the High Court was justified in denying the Appellant participation and clarification when its interim order directly impacted their property. Finally, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the Appellant was a proper party due to the direct consequences of the interim order. It directed the High Court to implead the Appellant, hear their related appeals (LPA and CR) independently on merits, and maintain status quo until these are resolved, emphasizing that all substantive questions remain open.