As per case facts, Respondent No.1 filed a commercial suit seeking to be inducted as a partner in Appellant's firm and also filed an application for temporary injunction to restrain ... quarry operations. The Commercial Court granted this injunction. Aggrieved, the Appellant challenged this order, arguing that the Respondent No.1 failed to establish a prima facie case, especially as the advance payment was returned without protest, and no contractual obligation existed. The question arose whether the Commercial Court correctly granted the temporary injunction. Finally, the High Court found that Respondent No.1 failed to establish a prima facie case or an implied contract. The Court noted the absence of a written agreement and the return of the advance. The balance of convenience favored the Appellant, and any potential loss to Respondent No.1 could be compensated monetarily. Consequently, the High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the temporary injunction order.