Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
The order of Reference dated 19 September 2017, which has
occasioned the constitution of a larger Bench, has been passed by learned
Single Judge, after having noticed the divergent opinions expressed by
...two
Division Benches of this Court in Sushila Steels Vs. Union Bank of India
and others (Special Appeal No. 415 of 2014, decided on 23.04.2014), and
Aum Jewels and others Vs. Vijaya Bank (Writ-C No. 13476 of 2017, decided on 30.3.2017) on the question whether an application under Section
17(1) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short 'the Act'), at the
instance of a borrower, is maintainable even before physical (actual)
possession of the secured assets is taken by the Bank/FIs in exercise of its
powers under Section 13(4) thereof read with Rule 8 of the Security Interest
(Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (for short “the Rules”).
Legal Notes
Add a Note....