As per the case facts, the appellant challenged a High Court Division Bench order that upheld a Single Bench's decision. The Single Bench had allowed a writ petition, which resulted ... in the cancellation of a letter of acceptance given to the appellant for a road reconstruction project. The appellant argued that the High Court's interim orders caused significant delays and losses. The appeal aimed to reinstate the appellant's contract and ability to complete the project. The question arose whether the High Court was justified in intervening in a public tender process and issuing interim orders that disrupted a public service contract, and if the initial rejection of the appellant's bid was legally flawed. Finally, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, stating that the decision to revoke the letter of acceptance was illegal. The Court directed the State to allow the appellant to resume and finish the work, excluding the period of delay caused by the stay. The Court also cautioned against light judicial interference in public service contracts and suggested that such petitions should be handled by a Division Bench to prevent delays.