As per case facts, the Petitioner, a pharmaceutical company, developed "777 Oil" for Psoriasis, registering it as a Trademark in 2001. When the Respondent adopted and registered "SANJEEVI 777 OIL," ... the Petitioner challenged it. The IPAB ordered the Respondent's mark removal, which was upheld in a Writ Petition. Despite this, the Single Judge dismissed the Petitioner's suit for injunction, stating neither party had bonafide adoption or monopoly rights. The appeal challenges this Judgment. The question arose whether the Single Judge erred in dismissing the suit, especially when the Respondent's trademark was rectified, and the Petitioner's marks remained registered. Finally, the High Court found the Single Judge's Judgment perverse, noting the Respondent's mark removal and the Petitioner's valid registrations. It set aside the impugned Order, decreeing the suit for injunction against infringement and passing off, directing an account of profits, and surrender of offending goods.