Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
This appeal arose from disputes among family members regarding the family businesses and properties. The parties agreed to resolve their disputes through arbitration. Two arbitrators, Mr. Pramod Kumar Khaitan and
...Mr. Sardul Singh Jain, conducted the arbitration, leading to an award on 6th October 1996. The respondents challenged the award in the Calcutta High Court, arguing that arbitration by two arbitrators was against Section 10 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which mandates that the number of arbitrators must not be even. The High Court set aside the award, and the appellant brought the matter to the Supreme Court.
Bench
Applied Acts & Sections
No Acts & Articles mentioned in this case
Source & Integrity Notice
This is a faithful reproduction of the official record from the e-Courts Services portal, extracted for research.
To ensure "Contextual Integrity," all AI insights must be cross-referenced with the official PDF,
which remains the sole authoritative version for judicial purposes.
This platform provides research aids, not legal advice; verify all content against the official Court Registry before legal use.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....