As per case facts, a Writ Appeal was filed, and the court expressed serious doubts regarding its maintainability. The court also noted that if the impugned order required any modification, ...
COURT NO.1
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK
Record of Proceedings
Page-1 of 3
WA No.01 of 2026
NHPC LIMITED APPELLANT (S)
VERSUS
HOMNATH NEOPANEY AND ORS. RESPONDENT (S)
For Appellant : Mr. Jorgay Namka, Senior Advocate with Mr. Lahang
Limboo, Mr. Sawal Rai and Ms. Rinchen Ongmu
Bhutia, Advocates.
For Respondent Nos. : Ms. Doma T. Bhutia, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nima
1, 2 and 3 Phuti Lepcha, Advocate.
For Respondent No.4 : Ms. Sangita Pradhan, Deputy Solicitor General of
India with Ms. Sittal Balmiki, Ms. Natasha Pradhan
and Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma, Advocates.
For Respondent No.5 : Ms. Pema Bhutia, Government Advocate.
Date: 13/02/2026
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, JUDGE
…
ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice)
We have serious doubts as to the maintainability of this Writ Appeal.
Nevertheless, we do not want to make any observation as to the maintainability
of this Appeal.
We note that the impugned order, if at all requires any modification, can be
done at the instance of the Writ Appellant, by placing facts before the learned
Single Judge.
With liberty as above, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed.
(Bhaskar Raj Pradhan) (A. Muhamed Mustaque)
Judge Chief Justice
pm/bp/ami
Legal Notes
Add a Note....