As per case facts, the petitioner retired from the Indian Army and was diagnosed with Hypertension (30% for life) by the Release Medical Board, which deemed it neither attributable to ... nor aggravated by military service. His claim for disability pension was rejected and upheld through appeals by the Armed Forces Tribunal. This Writ Petition challenges the Tribunal's order. The question arose whether the petitioner is entitled to disability pension given his service, the alleged stress, and the Board's findings under new regulations. Finally, the High Court, referencing Supreme Court decisions, affirmed that disability pension is not automatic, depends on rules and medical board opinion, and the presumptive factor is not universally applicable. It found no error in the Tribunal's decision, noting the petitioner predominantly served in peace areas and the disability was detected there.