1
AFR
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 46218 of 2013
Petitioner :- Pratik Singh
Respondent :- Union Of India Thru Secy. And Another
Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlesh Shukla ,R.P. Upadhayay,
Shagun K. Saran
Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I., Akhilesh Kumar Misra,
S.C., Santosh Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J.
Hon'ble Prabhat Chandra Tripathi,J.
(Delivered by Hon'ble Dilip Gupta, J.)
This petition has been filed for a direction upon the respondents
to declare the result of the Screening Test in which the petitioner had
appeared in India after obtaining the MBBS Degree from a Medical
Institution outside India, without requiring the petitioner to submit the
'Eligibility Certificate'. It was necessary for the petitioner to qualify
the Screening Test for enrollment in the Medical Register maintained
by the State Medical Council. The petitioner, however, also applied
for issuance of the Eligibility Certificate but the application was
rejected by order dated 7 October 2012. The petitioner has,
accordingly, sought the quashing of this order dated 7 October 2012
also.
The application filed by the petitioner for grant of Eligibility
Certificate has been rejected for the reason that the petitioner had not
studied Biology subject in both Class XI and Class XII before
appearing at the Intermediate Examination in 2003 which was a
requirement set out in the 'Regulations on Graduate Medical
NeutralmCitationmNo.m-m2017:AHC:56809-DB
2
Education, 1997'
1
. The order dated 7 October 2012 rejecting the claim
of the petitioner for grant of the Eligibility Certificate is reproduced
below:-
“After scrutiny of the application it is observed that you
have passed your 11
th
class from RET Inter College,
Dayal Bagh with Hindi, English, Physics, Chemistry and
Mathematics and 12
th
Class Qualification from Uttar
Pradesh Board of High & Intermediate Examination in
the year of 2003 with English, Chemistry and Physics.
Since you have not studied the subject of Biology in
both examinations, you do not fulfill the requirements for
admission to the Medical Course as per GRADUATE
MEDICAL EDUCATION REGULATIONS, 1997.
No candidate shall be allowed to be admitted to the
Medical Curriculum of first Bachelor of Medicine and
Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) Course until:
1. He/she shall complete the age of 17 years on or before
31
st
December of the year of admission to the MBBS
Course.
2. He/she has passed qualifying examination as under:-
1. The higher secondary examination or the Indian
School Certificate Examination which is
equivalent to 10+2 Higher Secondary Examination
after a period of 12 years study, the last two years
of study comprising of Physics, Chemistry,
Biology and Mathematics or any other elective
subjects with English at a level not less than core
course of English as prescribed by the National
Council of Educational Research and Training
after the introduction of the 10+2+3 years
educational structure as recommended by the
National Committee on education.”
The petitioner had appeared at the Intermediate Examination
conducted by the Board of High School and Intermediate Education,
Uttar Pradesh
2
in 2003 with General Hindi, English, Mathematics,
1the 1997 Regulations
2the Board
3
Physics and Chemistry but the petitioner also appeared at the 2004
Intermediate Examination conducted by the Board in Biology subject
in accordance with Regulation 17(2) contained in Chapter XII of the
Regulations framed under the provisions of the U.P. Intermediate
Education Act, 1921. Thereafter, the petitioner took admission in the
first year MBBS Course in B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences,
Dharan Nepal
3
in the year 2006. This course, which is of 5 years
duration, was completed by the petitioner in 2011 and a provisional
degree was granted to the petitioner in 2012 after he completed the
Residential Rotatory Internship.
The petitioner, then applied for enrollment in the Medical
Register maintained by the State Medical Council but for that purpose
it was necessary for the petitioner to qualify the Screening Test
conducted by the Prescribed Authority under the provisions of the
'Screening Test Regulations, 2002'
4
. The petitioner appeared at the
Screening Test. The result has not been declared because the
petitioner has not submitted the Eligibility Certificate that is issued
under the provisions of the 'Eligibility Requirement for taking
admission in an undergraduate medical course in a Foreign Medical
Institution Regulations, 2002'
5
. The petitioner had submitted an
application before the Medical Council of India on 19 September
2011 for grant of the Eligibility Certificate. According to the
petitioner no decision was taken. This petition was filed for a
3the Institute
4Screening Test Regulation
5the Eligibility Requirement Regulation
4
direction upon the respondents to declare the result of the Screening
Test without requiring the petitioner to submit the Eligibility
Certificate. During the course of hearing of the petitioner, the
respondents stated that the application for grant of the Eligibility
Certificate had been rejected by order dated 7 October 2012. The
petitioner moved an amendment application for adding a prayer for
quashing the order dated 7 October 2012. The amendment application
was allowed.
The order dated 7 October 2012 has placed reliance upon
Regulation 4 (a) of the 1997 Regulations. This Regulation provides
that a candidate shall be allowed to be admitted in the first year
MBBS Course if he has passed the Higher Secondary Examination or
the Indian School Certificate Examination after a period of 12 years
study, of which the last two years shall comprise of Physics,
Chemistry, Biology and Mathematics with English.
It is, therefore, necessary to reproduce Regulation 4 of the 1997
Regulations and it is as follows:-
“4. Admission to the Medical Course Eligibility
Criteria: No candidate shall be allowed to be admitted to the
Medical Curriculum proper of first Bachelor of Medicine and
Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) Course until:
(1)He/she shall complete the age of 17 years on or before
31
st
December of the year of admission to the MBBS Course.
(2) He/she has passed qualifying examination as under:
(a) The higher secondary examination or the Indian
School Certificate Examination which is equivalent to
10+2 Higher Secondary Examination after a period of
12 years study, the last two years of study comprising
of Physics, Chemistry, Biology and Mathematics or any
5
other elective subjects with English at a level not less
than the core course for English as prescribed by the
National Council for Educational Research and
Training after the introduction of the 10+2+3 years
educational structure as recommended by the National
Committee on education.
Note:Where the course content is not as prescribed for
10+2 education structure of the National Committee,
the candidates will have to undergo a period of one year
pre-professional training before admission to the
Medical colleges.
or
(b) The Intermediate examination in science of an
Indian University/Board or other recognized examining
body with Physics, Chemistry and Biology which shall
include a practical test in these subjects and also
English as a compulsory subject.
or
(c) The pre-professional/re-medical examination
with Physics, Chemistry and Biology, after passing
either the higher secondary school examination, or the
pre-university or an equivalent examination. The pre-
professional/pre-medical examination shall include a
practical test in Physics, Chemistry & Biology and also
English as a compulsory subject.
or
(d)The first year of the three years degree course of
a recognized university, with Physics, Chemistry and
Biology including a practical test in these subjects
provided the examination is a “University
Examination” and candidate has passed 10+2 with
English at a level not less than a core course.
or
(e)B.Sc. Examination of an Indian University,
provided that he/she has passed the B.Sc. examination
with not less than two of the following subjects
Physics, Chemistry, Biology (Botany, Zoology) and
further that he/she has passed the earlier qualifying
examination with the following subjects – Physics,
Chemistry, Biology and English.
or
(f)Any other examination which, in scope and
standard is found to be equivalent to the intermediate
science examination of an Indian University/ Board,
taking Physics, Chemistry and Biology including
practical test in each of these subjects and English.
6
Note:
The pre-medical course may be conducted either at
Medical College or a Science College.
Marks obtained in mathematics are not to be considered
for admission to MBBS course.
After the 10+2 course is introduced, the integrated
courses should be abolished.”
The issue, therefore, that arises for consideration in this petition
is whether the Medical Council of India could have refused the grant
of Eligibility Certificate to the petitioner for the reason that he had not
studied Biology subject in Class XI and Class XII before appearing at
the Intermediate Examination in Science. This, as noted above is the
sole reason given by the Medical Council of India in the impugned
order dated 7 October 2012 for rejecting the claim of the petitioner for
grant of the Eligibility Certificate.
The contention of Sri G.K. Singh, learned Senior Counsel
appearing for the petitioner is that the Authority completely failed to
appreciate that the petitioner had passed the Intermediate Examination
in Science and not the Higher Secondary Examination or the Indian
School Certificate Examination and, therefore, the admission
eligibility criteria was required to be examined under Regulation 4
(2) (b) of the 1997 Regulations in which there is no requirement that
the last two years of study in Class XI and Class XII should comprise
Physics, Chemistry, Biology and Mathematics subjects. Learned
Senior counsel submitted that the Authority, while examining the case
of the petitioner for grant of the Eligibility Certificate, have wrongly
7
placed reliance upon Regulation 4(2)(a) of the 1997 Regulations to
arrive at a conclusion that the petitioner was not eligible for
admission to MBBS course in the Institute at Nepal since he had not
studied Biology in Class XI and Class XII before appearing at the
Intermediate Examination in Science. The contention is that though
the petitioner had appeared at the Intermediate Examination in 2003
with Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics but the petitioner had also
appeared at the 2004 Intermediate Examination in Biology subject
and qualified it with practical test in accordance with the Regulations
framed by the Intermediate Board and was, therefore, clearly eligible
to be admitted to the MBBS Course in the Institute at Nepal. In such
circumstances, learned Senior Counsel contended that the requirement
for admission to the MBBS Course set out in Regulation 4 of the
1997 Regulations stood satisfied. It was, therefore, incumbent upon
the Authority to issue the Eligibility Certificate and on issuance of the
Eligibility Certificate, the result of the Screening Test can be declared
so that the petitioner becomes entitled to be enrolled on the Medical
Register maintained by the State Medical Council or have his name
entered in the Indian Medical Register if he qualifies the Screening
Test.
Sri Avanish Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the Medical
Council of India, which has been impleaded as respondent no.3 in the
writ petition, has, however, submitted that the Intermediate
Examination is of two years and unless a candidate has studied Class
8
XI and Class XII with Physics, Chemistry and Biology as subjects,
the candidate would not be considered eligible for taking admission to
the MBBS Course. His contention is that the petitioner had studied
Biology subject for only one year and, therefore, in view of the clear
stipulation contained in Clause 4 of the 1997 Regulations, the
petitioner was not entitled to be admitted in the MBBS Course and
consequently not entitled for the grant of Eligibility Certificate.
Learned counsel, therefore, submitted that the Authority committed
no error in rejecting the claim of the petitioner for issuance of the
Eligibility Certificate. It is also the contention of learned counsel that
the petitioner should have obtained the Eligibility Certificate prior to
asking admission in the MBBS Course in the Nepal Institute in view
of the provisions contained in Section 13(4)(B) of the Indian Medical
Council Act, 1956
6
which provides that a person who is a citizen of
India shall not, after such date, as may be prescribed by the Central
Government under sub-section (3), be eligible to get admission to
obtain medical qualification granted by any medical institution in any
foreign country without submission of the Eligibility Certificate
issued to him by the Council and in case such a person obtains the
qualification without such Eligibility Certificate, he shall not be
eligible to appear in the Screening Test.
We have considered the submissions advanced by learned
counsel for the parties.
6the Act
9
The relevant facts to determine whether the petitioner is entitled
to the grant of the Eligibility Certificate can be summarised as
follows:-
(i) The petitioner passed the Intermediate Examination in 2003
with Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, General Hindi and
English;
(ii) He appeared at the 2004 Intermediate Examination in
Biology subject with practical in accordance with the
Regulations framed by the Intermediate Board and was
declared passed;
(iii)The petitioner took admission in the MBBS Course in
2006 in the Institute at Nepal which is a Medical Institute
mentioned in Schedule II of Section 12 of Act;
(iv)The petitioner completed the five years MBBS Course in
2011 and a provisional degree was awarded in 2012 after
completing the Internship.
(v)Thereafter, the petitioner appeared at the Screening Test
so that he could be enrolled on a Medical Register maintained
by the State Medical Council or have his name entered in the
Indian Medical Council Register under Section 13 (4A) of the
Act;
(vi)For that purpose, the petitioner also moved an application
10
for grant of Eligibility Certificate;
(vii)The Eligibility Criteria is issued under the provisions of
the Eligibility Requirement Regulations. Regulation 8 provides
that for considering the application for grant of Eligibility
Certificate, it has to be verified whether the candidate fulfills
the eligibility criteria for admission to MBBS Course as
prescribed by the 1997 Regulations namely obtaining the
minimum qualifying marks in Physics, Chemistry, Biology and
English. Regulation 10 further provides that in case the
candidate does not fulfill any of the qualifying criteria, the
Council may reject the application for issuing the Eligibility
Certificate.
The Council has rejected the application filed by the petitioner
for issuance of the Eligibility Certificate for the reason that the
petitioner did not satisfy the requirement contained in Regulation 4(2)
(a), namely that the petitioner did not study Biology subject in the last
two years of study before appearing at the Intermediate Examination.
To appreciate the contentions advanced by the learned counsel
for the parties, it would be appropriate to first reproduce the relevant
provisions of the Act and the concerned Regulations. Sub-sections 4A
and 4B of Section 13 of the Act, which deal with Screening Test and
Eligibility Certificate, are reproduced below:-
“Section (4A):- A person who is a citizen of India and
11
obtains medical qualification granted by any medical
institution in any country outside India recognised for
enrolment as medical practitioner in that country after
such date as may be specified by the Central Government
under sub-section (3), shall not be entitled to be enrolled
on any Medical Register maintained by a State Medical
Council or to have his name entered in the Indian
Medical Register unless he qualifies the screening test in
India prescribed for such purpose and such foreign
medical qualification after such person qualifies the said
screening test shall be deemed to be the recognised
medical qualification for the purposes of this Act for that
person.
Section (4B):- A person who is a citizen of India shall
not, after such date as may be specified by the Central
Government under sub-section (3), be eligible to get
admission to obtain medical qualification granted by any
medical institution in any foreign country without
obtaining an eligibility certificate issued to him by the
Council and in case any such person obtains such
qualification without obtaining such eligibility certificate,
he shall not be eligible to appear in the screening test
referred to in sub-section (4A):
Provided that an Indian citizen who has acquired the
medical qualification from foreign medical institution or
has obtained admission in foreign medical institution
before the commencement of the Indian Medical Council
(Amendment) Act, 2001 shall not be required to obtain
eligibility certificate under this sub-section but, if he is
qualified for admission to any medical course for
recognised medical qualification in any medical
institution in India, he shall be required to qualify only
the screening test prescribed for enrolment on any State
Medical Register or for entering his name in the Indian
Medical Register.”
The result of the Screening Test, in which the petitioner had
appeared, has been withheld for the reason that the petitioner does not
have an Eligibility Certificate. Regulations 3, 4 and 11 of the
Screening Test Regulations are relevant and are reproduced:
“3. An Indian citizen possessing a primary medical
qualification awarded by any medical institution
outside India who is desirous of getting provisional or
12
permanent registration with the Medical Council of
India or any State Medical Council on or after
15.03.2002 shall have to qualify a screening test
conducted by the prescribed authority for that purpose
as per the provisions of section 13 of the Act:
Provided that a person seeking permanent registration
shall not have to qualify the screening test if he/she had
already qualified the same before getting his/her
provisional registration.
4. Eligibility Criteria: No person shall be allowed
to appear in the screening test unless:
1. he/she is a citizen of India and possesses any primary
medical qualification, either whose name and the
institution awarding it are included in the World
Directory of Medical Schools, published by the World
Health Organisation; or which is confirmed by the
Indian Embassy concerned to be a recognised
qualification for enrolment as medical practitioner in
the country in which the institution awarding the said
qualification is situated.
2. he/she had obtained 'Eligibility Certificate' from the
Medical Council of India as per the 'Eligibility
Requirement for taking admission in an undergraduate
medical course in a Foreign Medical Institution
Regulations, 2002. This requirement shall not be
necessary in respect of Indian citizens who have
acquired the medical qualifications from foreign
medical institutions or have obtained admission in
foreign medical institution before 15
th
March, 2002.
11. The Prescribed Authority shall intimate the result
of the Screening Test to the candidates as well as to the
Secretary, Medical Council of India and the State
Medical Councils. The unsuccessful candidates shall
also be appropriately informed. The candidates who
qualify the Screening Test may apply to the Secretary,
Medical Council of India, New Delhi or to any State
Medical Council for provisional registration/permanent
registration alongwith the requisite registration fee in
favour of Secretary, Medical Council of India or the
State Medical Council. The Medical Council of India
or the State Medical Councils shall issue provisional
registration to such successful candidates, who are yet
to undergo one year internship in an approved
institution and issue permanent registration to such
13
eligible candidates who have already undergone one
year internship, as the case may be.”
At this stage it will also be useful to reproduce Regulations 3,
4, 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the Eligibility Requirement Regulations dealing
with the Eligibility Certificate and they are:-
“3. An Indian citizen, who has passed the qualifying
examination either from India or an equivalent
examination from abroad and is desirous of joining an
undergraduate medical course in any foreign medical
institution on or after 15th March, 2002 shall approach
the Council for issue of an Eligibility Certificate for that
purpose.
4. The request for issue of Eligibility Certificate shall be
made by the candidate in the proforma prescribed by the
Council and shall be accompanied by the original
certificate/mark-sheet (alongwith Photostat copy) of the
qualifying examination. The original certificate shall be
returned to the candidate after verifying the same with
the photostat copy which shall be retained by the
Council. Request shall also be accompanied by a
Demand Draft for the specified sum in favour of
Secretary, Medical Council of India, New Delhi. The fee
shall be fixed by the Council.
5.....
6.....
7.....
8. The Council shall consider the application for
Eligibility Certificate and verify the following details as
per the Regulations of the Council:-
1. Whether the candidate fulfills the age criterion
prescribed by the Council?
2. Whether the candidate fulfills the eligibility
criteria for admission to MBBS course in India as
prescribed in the Graduate Medical Education
Regulations, 1997, i.e., minimum qualifying marks
criteria in Physics, Chemistry, Biology and
English, including relaxed criteria in case the
candidate belongs to a reserved category?
3. If the candidate belongs to SC/ST/OBC, whether
he/she has produced a caste certificate from a
14
Competent Authority.
9. After verification, as required, if the candidate is found
to fulfill the eligibility criteria, the Council shall issue an
Eligibility Certificate in the prescribed format to the
candidate certifying that he/she is eligible to join a
medical institution outside India to obtain a primary
medical qualification. The certificate shall indicate that
on return after obtaining the foreign primary medical
qualification, the candidate shall have to undergo a
screening test, subject to fulfillment of the conditions
prescribed in the Screening Test Regulations, 2002, and
that passing this test shall only entitle him to
provisional/permanent registration by the Medical
Council of India or the State Medical Councils.
10. In case the candidate does not fulfill any of the
qualifying criteria the Council may reject his application
for issue of Eligibility Certificate giving the reasons
therefore.
11. The issue of a eligibility certificate to a candidate
shall not entitle him to any right, whatsoever, other than
to take admission in an undergraduate medical course in
a foreign Medical Institute.”
Thus, a person who obtains a medical qualification granted by
any Medical Institution in a foreign country can be enrolled on a
Medical Register maintained by the State Medical Council only after
he qualifies the Screening Test. The Screening Test Regulations
provide that a person would be eligible to appear in the Screening Test
only after he obtains the Eligibility Certificate from the Medical
Council of India in accordance with the requirements contained in the
Eligibility Requirement Regulations. The Eligibility Requirement
Regulations provides that Eligibility Certificate would be issued after
verifying that the candidate fulfills the eligibility criteria for
admission to MBBS Course as prescribed in the 1997 Regulations.
The 1997 Regulations provides for six alternative qualifying
15
examinations. Regulation 4(2)(a) deals with the Higher Secondary
Examination or the Indian School Certificate Examination, while
Regulation 4(2)(d) deals with Intermediate Examination in Science.
The petitioner has been denied the Eligibility Certificate for the
reason that the petitioner does not satisfy the requirement contained in
Regulation 4 (2) (a) of the 1997 Regulations for taking admission in
the MBBS Course. Regulation 4 deals with admission to the Medical
Course. Clause (1) provides that no candidate shall be allowed to be
admitted in the first year MBBS Course until the candidate has
completed the age of 17 years on or before 31 December of the year
of admission in the MBBS Course. Clause (2) provides that the
candidate should have passed the qualifying examination enumerated
in clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) or clause (d) or clause (e) or
clause (f). Clause (a) refers to Higher Secondary Examination or the
Indian School Certificate Examination. It provides that the candidate
should have passed either of the aforesaid examinations after a period
of 12 years study, but the last two years of study should comprise
Physics, Chemistry, Biology and Mathematics subjects or any other
elective subjects with English. Clause (b) refers to Intermediate
Examination in Science. It provides that the candidate should have
passed the Intermediate Examination in Science with Physics,
Chemistry and Biology, which shall include a practical test in these
subjects and also English as a compulsory subject. Clauses (c) or (d)
or (e) or (f) refer to other examinations. The relevant alternative
16
clauses are (a) and (b) since the Medical Council of India is relying
upon clause (a), while the petitioner is relying upon clause (b).
Clause (a) and (b) are contained in the same Regulation 4 of
1997 Regulations. What is important is that whereas clause (a), which
refers to Higher Secondary Examination or the Indian School
Certificate Examination, requires a period of study of 12 years, of
which the last two years of study should comprise Physics, Chemistry,
Biology and Mathematics, clause (b) is silent on this requirement of
study of Physics, Chemistry, Biology in the last last two years of
study. The Regulation making body, in its wisdom, has itself drawn a
distinction between the eligibility requirement set out in clause (a)
and clause (b) inasmuch as a candidate who has passed the Higher
Secondary Examination or the Indian School Certificate Examination
is required to study Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Mathematics and
English in Class XI and Class XII which are the last two years of his
study but for a candidate who has passed the Intermediate
Examination in Science with Physics, Chemistry and Biology there is
no such requirement.
It needs to be remembered that the Higher Secondary
Examination/Indian School Certificate Examination as well as the
Intermediate Examination are all 10 + 2 Examinations. Yet a
distinction has been drawn by the Medical Council of India in the
1997 Regulations. The Higher Secondary Examination and the Indian
School Certificate Examination have been clubbed together under
17
Regulation 4(2)(a), but for the Intermediate Examination a separate
requirement is contained in Regulation 4(2)(b) of the 1997
Regulations. It also needs to be noted that while Regulation 4(2)(a)
deals with Physics, Chemistry, Biology and Mathematics with
English, Regulation 4(2)(b) deals with Physics, Chemistry and
Biology only. The Regulation making body was aware of the
examinations conducted by these three separate Boards. It was aware
that the Intermediate Board permits a candidate under Regulation
17(2) contained in Chapter XII to opt for one or at the most four
subjects, after having cleared the Intermediate Examination. Thus, a
candidate who qualifies the Intermediate Examination in particular
year has the option to appear in all or any of the four subjects
including Biology in subsequent year. Thus, a candidate who has
qualified the Intermediate Examination can opt for Biology subject in
the subsequent year and on clearing it would be issued a certificate. It
is for this reason that there is no requirement for a candidate
appearing in the Intermediate Examination to study Physics,
Chemistry and Biology in both Class XI and Class XII. Such a
distinction has been consciously made and the requirement of study of
Biology both in Class XI and Class XII cannot be inferred in the
eligibility requirement contained in Regulation 4(2)(b).
The impugned order dated 7 October 2012, by which the claim
of the petitioner for grant of the Eligibility Certificate has been
rejected, only refers to clause (a) of Regulation 4(2). The petitioner, it
18
needs to be emphasized, had not passed the Higher Secondary
Examination or the Indian School Certificate Examination. There is
no doubt that the petitioner had passed the Intermediate Examination
conducted by the Board in 2003 with Physics, Chemistry and
Mathematics and had subsequently appeared at the Intermediate
Examination in Biology subject in 2004 in accordance with the
Regulations and cleared it. Clause (b) of Regulation 4(2) dealing with
Intermediate Examination does not require study of Biology, Physics
or Mathematics during last two years, unlike, the requirement
contained in clause (a) for a candidate who appears at the Higher
Secondary Examination or the Indian School Certificate Examination.
What has to be noticed is that the Medical Council of India has
not even referred to clause (b) of Regulation 4 (2) of the 1997
Regulations, which clause specifically deals with a candidate who has
appeared at the Intermediate Examination. The order only refers to
clause (a) relating to a candidate who has appeared at the Higher
Secondary or the Indian School Certificate Examination. Learned
counsel for the Medical Council of India has however, submitted that
mere reference to a wrong Regulation will not make any difference
because even under Regulation 4 (2) (b), the petitioner should have
undertaken two years of study of Biology subject before appearing at
the Intermediate Examination. The eligibility requirement under
clause (b) has been examined and there is no manner of doubt that
clause (b) does not require that a candidate should have studied
19
Biology subject for two years before appearing at the Intermediate
Examination.
A Division Bench of the Patna High Court in Letters Patent
Appeal No.1136 of 2015
7
, arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction
Case No.20894 of 2014 also examined whether Eligibility Certificate
can be granted to a candidate who passed the Intermediate
Examination in the same manner, as the petitioner has. The candidate
passed the Intermediate Examination conducted by the Intermediate
Education Council, Patna in 2005 with Physics, Chemistry and
Mathematics and then appeared in the 2006 Examination with
Biology as an additional subject. After clearing it, the candidate took
admission in the National Medical College, Birganj in Nepal in 2008,
and cleared the MBBS Examination in 2014. The Eligibility
Certificate was not granted for the reason that the candidate had not
studied Biology for two years.
The Patna High Court emphasised that the requirements
contained in Regulation 4 of the 1997 Regulations are alternative
requirements and either of them can make a candidate eligible for
seeking admission to the MBBS Course. The Court noticed the
distinction between the eligibility requirement prescribed under
Regulation 4(2)(a) and 4(2)(b) of the Regulations and held that there
was no requirement of two years of study of Biology subject under
Regulation 4(2)(b). The Court, therefore, set aside the order rejecting
7Aiman Kamal v. The Medical Council of India and Others decided on 23 August 2016
20
the request for issue of Eligibility Certificate and the observations are
as follows:-
“22. On the basis of the pleadings on record and rival
submissions made on behalf of the parties, the issues, which
have emerged for determination in the present appeal can be
summarized as under:-
Is it essential for a candidate to have undergone
two years of study, simultaneously in the
subjects Physics, Chemistry and Biology at
Intermediate/+2 level in order to acquire
eligibility for admission to MBBS course in
Medical Colleges in India, as contemplated
under Regulation 4(2) of the "Regulations on
Graduate Medical Education, 1979" as noted
above? In the present case, the moot question is as to
whether a candidate is disqualified from being admitted
to MBBS course under the said Regulations on the
ground that the Regulation 4(2)(e) of the same provides
for two years course in Physics, Chemistry and Biology,
whereas the appellant pursued her one year course as
regular student, in Biology, to secure certificate of
passing Intermediate course in the said subject, after
having passed the two years course in the subjects
Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics? ….....
24. Unlike the case of Rajendra Prasad Mathur
(supra), the Medical Council of India has laid down, in
the present case, alternative conditions of eligibility
under Regulation 4(2) of the Regulations as quoted and
discussed hereinabove, which includes passing of
Intermediate Examination in Science of an Indian
University/Board or other recognized body, Physics,
Chemistry, Biology/Bio Chemistry. There is another
alternative qualification at clause (f) under Regulation
4(2) of the Regulations according to which, a candidate,
who has passed an examination of which, the scope and
standard is found to be Intermediate Science
Examination of an Indian University/Board taking
Physics, Chemistry and Biology including practical test,
is eligible for admission to MBBS course. Whereas at
(a) Regulation 4(2), 12 years of study is
specifically provided, there is no such
prescription at (b) and (f). For this purpose, we
need to closely examine Regulation 4(2) of the
Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997. We
have already extracted Regulation 4(2) in the foregoing
21
paragraphs, which prescribes alternative conditions of
eligibility for admission to MBBS course.
25.....
26. Upon careful reading of Regulation 4(2) of
the said Regulations, we find ostensible
distinction between the qualification prescribed
under Regulation 4(2)(a) and 4(2)(b) of the
Regulations. For a candidate to be eligible for
admission to MBBS course, under Regulation
4(2)(a) of the said Regulations, he/she is
required to have passed Higher Secondary
Examination or Indian School Certificate
Examination, which is equivalent to 10+2
Higher Secondary Examination after a period of
twelve years, the last two years of study
comprising of Physics, Chemistry, Biology/Bio-
technology and Mathematics or any other elective
subjects with English......... Whereas in Regulation
4(2)(a), passing of Higher Secondary
Examination/Indian School Certificate
Examination after a period of twelve years of
study, the "last two-years of study", comprising
Physics, Chemistry and Biology/Bio-
technology, has been prescribed as the
eligibility qualification, no such period has
been mentioned under Regulation 4(2)(b) of the
said Regulations in relation to Intermediate
examination in Science of an Indian
University/Board or other recognized
examining body with Physics, Chemistry and
Biology/Bio-technology. The qualification,
prescribed under Regulation 4(2)(b) of the said
Regulations, is certainly alternative to the
qualification as prescribed under Regulation
4(2)(a) of the Regulations.
27.......
28.What we find in Regulation 4(2) of the
said Regulations is that there is intentional
omission of "last two-years of study", in
Regulation 4(2)(b) of the Regulations, which
expression is there in Regulation 4(2)(a) of the
Regulations.…........
The reason, which has been assigned in the
communication, is that as per the Regulations
of Medical Council of India on Graduate
Medical Education, 1997, a candidate has to
22
undergo two-years of study in subjects Physics,
Chemistry and Biology for issuing eligibility
certificate.….......
30. In our view, thus, the decision of the
Medical Council of India, refusing to grant
eligibility certificate to the appellant on the
ground that a candidate has to undergo "two-
years of study in Physics, Chemistry and
Biology" as mandatory for issuing of eligibility
certificate, cannot be sustained inasmuch as the
Medical Council of India has not considered
the case of the appellant with reference to
Regulation 4(2)(b) and 4(2)(f) of the Regulations
of the Council on Graduate Medical Education, 1997,
and Regulation 13 of the Regulations for Intermediate
examination, framed by the Bihar Intermediate
Education Council, Patna.”
(Emphasis supplied)
Learned counsel for the Medical Council of India, has,
however, placed reliance upon judgement of a learned Judge of the
Delhi High Court in Writ Petition No.10133 of 2009
8
and has
submitted that the requirement of two years of study of Biology even
for a candidate who has passed the Intermediate Examination is an
essential requirement and the Medical Council of India can reject the
application for issuance of the Eligibility Certificate under clause 10
of the Eligibility Requirement Regulations.
The Delhi High Court also examined whether an Eligibility
Certificate can be granted to a candidate who had appeared at the
Intermediate Examination in 2006 and had subsequently again
appeared at 2007 Intermediate Examination with Biology as an
additional subject. The Court inferred that the requirement contained
8 Mohammad Parvez Akhtar Vs. Union of India and Others decided on 31 August 2009
23
in clause (a) of Regulation 4 (2) regarding two years of study in
Physics, Chemistry, Biology and Mathematics subjects should be read
in clause (b) and the observations are as follows:
“26. The plea of the petitioner that in Code 2 of
clause 8 (v) of Bulletin of Information, two years
of study in Biology is not specifically provided
and so it should not be read into it is also not
acceptable as on the basis of examination such
distinction should not be carved out.
Classification on the basis of type of examination
i.e two years continuous study in one particular
examination and not insisting for two years study
in respect of another examination will not be
permissible. The learned counsel for the
petitioner has also contended that in the
intermediate examination from the U.P Board a
candidate is not allowed to take Mathematics
with Biology. Therefore, the petitioner had taken
Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics, he was not
allowed to take Biology and therefore, after
qualifying intermediate examination in 2006, he
took Biology as an additional subject and
qualified the same with practical in 2007 as a
regular subject. This is not disputed that a candidate is
entitled to take Physics, Chemistry and Biology even for
the intermediate examination. Such a candidate who opts
for biology in preference to Mathematics, study Biology for
two years with practical. Therefore, if the petitioner wanted
to join MBBS course he should have opted for Biology as a
regular subject with a study of two years. If MCI insists on
last two years study in each subject being essential on the
reasoning that such study necessarily assimilates with
periodic practical and evaluation of students in such activity
is vital for the study of medicine, such insistence cannot be
termed as an empty or ritualistic experience but is a matter
of maintaining standard having regard to the nature of
medical education and it cannot be ignored on the grounds
as has been alleged by the petitioner. If in Code 1 of
clause 8 (v) a two years study in each subject is
required, then for the same reasoning the two
years study of each subject in necessary even
under other Codes of clause 8 (v) and has to be
read in Code 2 of clause 8 (v) also ”.......
(Emphasis supplied)
24
Learned counsel for the Medical Council of India has also
pointed out that Special Appeal filed by Mohd. Parvez Akhtar was
dismissed on 12 October 2009 and the Special Leave Petition was
also dismissed by the Supreme Court on 5 July 2010. It needs to be
noted that dismissal of the Special Leave Petition would only mean
that the judgement of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court
attained finality.
There are, therefore, two contrary views interpreting Regulation
4(2)(b) of the 1997 Regulations. The Patna High Court has held that a
candidate who has qualified the Intermediate Examination need not
have studied Biology subject for two years as is the requirement
contained in Regulation 4(2)(a) of the 1997 Regulations. The Delhi
High Court has, however, held that the requirement of two years of
study of Biology, even though not contained in Regulation 4(2)(b),
should be read in it since it is a requirement contained in Regulation
4(2)(a). For the reasons we have already indicated, it is difficult to
subscribe to be the view taken by the Delhi High Court.
It is, therefore, clear that while rejecting the application filed by
the petitioner for grant of the Eligibility Certificate, the Authority did
not even consider it appropriate to examine that the petitioner had
passed the Intermediate Examination and not the Higher Secondary
Examination/Indian School Certificate Examination because the
impugned order refers to the requirements contained in Regulation
4(2)(a) which relate to Higher Secondary Examination/Indian School
25
Certificate Examination. The denial of the Eligibility Certificate to the
petitioner in 2012 has resulted in non-declaration of the Screening
Test result in which the petitioner had appeared. This has
consequently led to a situation where the petitioner cannot be enrolled
on the Medical Register maintained by the State Medical Council.
The callous attitude of the Authority has, therefore, resulted in loss of
five precious years of the petitioner.
Thus, for all the reasons stated above, the admission of the
petitioner in the MBBS course was in accordance with Regulation 4
of the 1997 Regulations and the decision contained in the order dated
7 October 2012 that the petitioner did not fulfill the criteria contained
in Regulation 4(2)(a) of the 1997 Regulations, is patently wrong. The
petitioner is, therefore, clearly entitled to the issuance of an Eligibility
Certificate since that is the only reason assigned in the order for not
granting the Eligibility Certificate.
Learned counsel for the Medical Council of India in the end,
made an attempt to support the impugned order by contending that the
petitioner was not entitled to be admitted to the MBBS course in the
Nepal Institute since he had not submitted the Eligibility Certificate
before taking admission and in this connection learned counsel
referred to Section 13 (4B) of the Act.
In the first instance, such a reason has not even been mentioned
by the Medical Council of India in the order rejecting the claim of the
26
petitioner for grant of the Eligibility Certificate. Even otherwise, the
petitioner had taken admission in the MBBS Course in an Institute
referred to in Section 12 of the Act in the year 2006. The name of the
Institute is mentioned in the Second Schedule. The Medical Council
of India had at the relevant time in 2006 drawn a distinction between
medical qualification granted by Institutions referred to in Section 12
(Schedule II) and Section 13 (Part-II of Schedule III) since after
introduction of sub-sections 4 (A) and (B) in Section 13 of the Act,
the Medical Council of India maintained that it was not necessary for
candidates seeking admission to a Medical Institution referred to in
Section 12 (Schedule II) to submit the Eligibility Certificate before
taking admission in the MBBS Course and candidates seeking
admission to an Institution referred to in Section 13 (Part II of the
Third Schedule) alone was required to submit the Eligibility
Certificate. Candidates who were seeking admission to a Medical
Institution referred to in Section 12 (Second Schedule), therefore, did
not apply for such a certificate. It is only, when the Courts did not
accept the view of the Medical Council of India that there is a
distinction between a Medical Institution referred to in Section 12 and
a Medical Institution referred to in Section 13 that the Medical
Council of India issued a Press Note on 8 October 2008 that it was
also henceforth necessary for a candidate seeking admission to a
medical institution referred to in Section 12 (Schedule II) to submit
the Eligibility Certificate before taking admission in the MBBS
27
Course. The relevant portion of the Press Note dated 8 October 2008
which explains this position is as follows:
“On a further examination of the relevant facts, the
provisions of the Act including the amendments carried
out in the year 2001, the provisions of the regulations
dated 18.02.2002, i.e., Screening Test Regulations and
Eligibility Certificate Regulations relatable to Section
13(4)A and 13(4)B of the Act, it has been observed that a
careful and correct reading of the provisions of the Act
and the regulations do stipulate that all the Indian
citizens who secure primary medical qualification
(MBBS) from any foreign medical institution which is
either included in the Schedule-II or included in Part-II
of the IIIrd Schedule shall be required to qualify the
screening test under the provisions of the Screening Test
Regulations.
The only exception which has been made is with regard
to the temporary permissions which are granted by the
MCI for the purposes of research, medical services for
charitable and philanthropic purposes under the
provisions of Section-14 of the Act. It was submitted
before the High Court that there seems to be a bonafide,
however, an erroneous understanding of the requirements
of the provisions of the IMC (Amendment) Act, 2001
and the Screening Test Regulations. The requirement of
law gets clear on the proper reading and understanding of
the above-mentioned statutory position under the Act. It
would neither depend on the affidavit(s) of any authority,
Govt. of India etc. nor would it be dependent upon the
erroneous impression or understanding of any authority
including the Council. In any case, the ultimate analysis
and interpretation shall be within the exclusive
jurisdiction of the Hon'ble Courts requiring the
concerned authorities to abide by it.
It is further made clear that henceforth all
those Indian students who are desirous of
seeking admission in any foreign medical
institution, shall be required to obtain an
"Eligibility Certificate" from the MCI under
the Eligibility Certificate Regulations 2002,
before they are admitted in any foreign medical
institution whether recognized under section 12
or under section 13 of the Indian Medical
Council Act, 1956.”
(Emphasis supplied)
28
The petitioner had taken admission in the Nepal institute in the
year 2006 much prior to the issuance of the Press Note dated 8
October 2008. At that point of time, as noticed above, the Medical
Council of India was clearly of the view that a candidate seeking
admission in a Foreign Medical Institute referred to in Section 12
(Schedule II) was not required to submit the Eligibility Certificate
before taking admission in the MBBS Course. It is only when this
view of the Medical Council of India was not accepted by the Courts
that a Press Note was issued on 8 October 2008 requiring that a
candidate seeking admission to a Foreign Medical Institute referred to
in Section 12 (Schedule II) has to also submit the Eligibility
Certificate before taking admission. It is, therefore, not open to the
learned counsel for the Medical Council of India to contend that the
petitioner could not have been granted admission to the MBBS
Course in the Nepal Institute, which is an institute referred to in
Section 12 (Schedule II), since the Eligibility Certificate was not
submitted by the petitioner before taking admission. It is obvious that
is for this reason that such a ground was not even taken by the
Medical Council of India in the order dated 7 October 2012 while
rejecting the application filed by the petitioner for grant of the
Eligibility Certificate. Thus, even this additional reason of learned
counsel for the Medical Council of India cannot be accepted.
The impugned order dated 7 October 2012 denying the issuance
of the Eligibility Certificate to the petitioner, therefore, deserves to be
29
set aside and is set aside. The Medical Council of India shall now take
a decision for issuance of the Eligibility Certificate to the petitioner
strictly in the light of the observations made above within a period of
three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is filed by the
petitioner. The writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated above.
Order Date :- 4.4.2017
S.Sharma
(Dilip Gupta,J.)
(Prabhat Chandra Tripathi,J.)
Legal Notes
Add a Note....