As per case facts, the Petitioner challenged an order granting unilateral deemed conveyance of a plot, arguing that earlier contractual documents only contemplated leasehold rights. Original owners agreed to sell ... property to a housing society, which subdivided it. Development rights for a specific plot were assigned to the Petitioner. Flat purchaser agreements also referenced leasehold. The owner society received development permission with a condition prohibiting leasing for a certain period, and no registered lease was ever executed. The question arose whether the Competent Authority could direct a conveyance of sale when contracts only indicated leasehold, and if private agreements supersede the promoter's statutory duty under MOFA. Finally, the Court ruled that Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act mandates the promoter to convey full right, title, and interest. Since no registered lease existed and the promoter held ownership, private agreements for lease cannot override the statutory obligation. The order for deemed conveyance was upheld.