As per case facts, the Petitioner, Raja Alias Regan, was detained under the Goonda Act by the Respondent No. 2, and this detention was subsequently approved and confirmed by Respondent ... No. 1, due to his alleged habitual involvement in criminal activities affecting public order. The Petitioner challenged the detention citing procedural irregularities, specifically the failure to furnish him with copies of documents relied upon by the Detaining Authority, violating his constitutional right to effective representation. The question arose whether the detention orders were sustainable in law, given the alleged procedural violations. Finally, the Court held that all material relied upon by the Detaining Authority must be supplied to the detenue to enable effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. Since the Detaining Authority failed to provide the relied-upon documents, only furnishing the detention order and grounds, the fundamental right of the detenue was violated. Therefore, the writ petition was allowed, and the detention orders were quashed.