As per case facts, Mahadeb Lal Show, who died in 1962, executed a will in 1960. His son, Kartick, initially filed for probate in 1975, which was withdrawn. A second ... application in 1989 became Title Suit No. 14 of 1991, where other children of Mahadeb challenged the will's validity, citing lack of mental capacity, fabrication, undue influence by Kartick, and suspicious circumstances like uneven distribution and a shaky signature. They also argued the probate application was time-barred. The trial court granted probate. The appeal seeks to overturn this judgment. The question arose whether the will was validly executed and attested, whether the testator possessed mental capacity, if there was undue influence or fabrication, and if the considerable delay in filing for probate should render it invalid. Finally, the Court found compelling evidence of the testator's sound mind and volition, proving the will's execution and attestation by secondary evidence. Allegations of fabrication, shaky signature, and uneven distribution were unsubstantiated. The delay in seeking probate was adequately explained by settlement negotiations, rebutting any suspicion. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the grant of probate.