As per case facts, a matrimonial dispute led the wife and son to file for maintenance. The Family Court awarded maintenance but from a later date. Petitioners appealed for enhanced ... maintenance and an earlier effective date, citing cruelty and the son's higher education expenses despite being major. The respondent husband challenged the award, arguing the wife left without reason, was capable of earning, and the son was major, insisting maintenance be based on their financial status at separation. The question arose whether the awarded maintenance was adequate, its effective date, and a major son's entitlement to support for higher education. Finally, the High Court modified the Family Court's order, directing maintenance from the application date, setting initial and later amounts for the wife, and enhancing the son's maintenance until graduation to cover educational expenses. The Court affirmed the husband's obligation for his child's education regardless of majority and his improved financial standing, dismissing the husband's appeal.