Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
You have successfully created your account,
now you can explore our platform with Lifetime Free Plan
Ex-Servicemen Pension, CCS Pension Rules 1972, Rule 88, Himachal Pradesh High Court, Qualifying Service, Appointment Delay, Demobilized Armed Forces Personnel Rules, Ranjeet Singh vs State of HP, Civil Service Re-employment
03 Mar, 2026
Listen in 00:40 mins | Read in 00:00 mins
As per case facts, the Petitioner, an ex-serviceman, was nominated for a Police Constable post but faced significant delays from the Respondents in accepting his joining, which finally occurred much
...later. This delay prevented him from completing the required service for pension benefits before his retirement. His representations and previous petitions for counting the delayed period as qualifying service were rejected. The question arose whether the Respondents' unjustified delay in the Petitioner's appointment should be rectified to grant him pensionary benefits. Finally, the High Court found the delay illegal and unjust. It allowed the petition, deeming the Petitioner appointed shortly after his nomination, thus entitling him to pension under CCS Pension Rules, 1972, with consequential benefits within three months.
Bench
Applied Acts & Sections
No Acts & Articles mentioned in this case
Source & Integrity Notice
This is a faithful reproduction of the official record from the e-Courts Services portal, extracted for research.
To ensure "Contextual Integrity," all AI insights must be cross-referenced with the official PDF,
which remains the sole authoritative version for judicial purposes.
This platform provides research aids, not legal advice; verify all content against the official Court Registry before legal use.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....