As per case facts, the appellant, a daily wage earner, was terminated from service after working from November 1988 to June 1994. He claimed continuous service for over 240 days ... before termination, making it illegal retrenchment without complying with the Industrial Disputes Act. The Labour Court ruled in his favor, directing reinstatement with back wages, which a Single Judge upheld. However, the High Court's Division Bench overturned this, stating the appellant failed to prove continuous service and the certificate he presented was fabricated. The question arose whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the concurrent findings of fact by the Labour Court and Single Judge regarding the appellant's continuous service and the authenticity of his evidence. Finally, the Supreme Court found merit in the appeal, holding that the workman had provided cogent evidence, including a certificate which the High Court did not properly discredit, and therefore, the Division Bench erred in interfering with the concurrent findings of fact, thus restoring the Labour Court's award for reinstatement.