As per case facts, the Petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR No.108 of 2025 under the POCSO Act, arising from a consensual romantic relationship between him (nineteen years old) ... and the victim (fifteen years and six months old) that led to the victim's pregnancy and subsequent childbirth. A previous bail application was rejected on grounds of statutory rape. The question arose whether the Petitioner should be granted bail, considering the consensual nature of the relationship, absence of force, violence, or criminal intent, his lack of criminal antecedents, and the humanitarian aspect that his parents are supporting the victim and the newborn child. Finally, the Court allowed the bail application, concluding that keeping the Petitioner incarcerated would be a travesty of justice given the circumstances, and that the facts did not indicate any criminal intent. The Court clarified that these remarks are solely for the purpose of the bail petition and should not be construed as an opinion on the merits of the main case.