Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
As per case facts, Haryana Public Service Commission (Appellant) issued advertisements for PGT (Maths) posts, involving a three-stage examination: Screening Test, Subject Knowledge Test, and Interview/Viva-Voce. The writ petitioner (Respondent)
...from BC (B) Category secured higher marks than some General Category candidates in the screening test but was not called for the next stage due to a higher category cut-off. She claimed migration to the General Category based on merit at the screening test stage. The Single Judge allowed the writ petition, directing a revision of the screening test result. The appeal challenges this. The question arose whether reserved category candidates scoring higher marks than general category candidates in a preliminary test should migrate to the open category at that initial stage. Finally, the High Court, relying on Supreme Court judgments, held that the principle of migration based on merit applies even at the screening test stage. It found the Single Judge's decision justified, directing a fresh merit list starting with the Open Category, considering all candidates based on merit.
Bench
Applied Acts & Sections
No Acts & Articles mentioned in this case
Source & Integrity Notice
This is a faithful reproduction of the official record from the e-Courts Services portal, extracted for research.
To ensure "Contextual Integrity," all AI insights must be cross-referenced with the official PDF,
which remains the sole authoritative version for judicial purposes.
This platform provides research aids, not legal advice; verify all content against the official Court Registry before legal use.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....