As per case facts, the petitioner, State Bank of India, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate, Soreng District, to dispose of its application filed under ... Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act for taking over secured assets. The District Magistrate had initially acted on the application and issued notices for taking over assets but later postponed the action due to an order from the DRT, Siliguri, which restrained the petitioner from taking physical possession of the property. The question arose whether the writ petition was maintainable given that the District Magistrate had already acted upon the application and an order from the DRT, which was not under challenge, had caused the postponement of the physical possession. Finally, the Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the District Magistrate had indeed acted upon the petitioner's application and passed effective orders. The Court noted that the DRT's restraining order, which stayed the District Magistrate's action, was not challenged in the present writ petition and that the DRT's jurisdiction to pass such an order was not disputed. Therefore, the Court found that the writ petition lacked a cause as the primary relief sought had already been addressed, albeit with a subsequent stay from another forum. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the appropriate forum or take further steps.