As per case facts, Shish Ram was murdered due to an ancestral land dispute where he transferred land to his complainant son's children, depriving Ran Singh of his share. Rajinder ... Singh was accused of causing injuries with a pharsa, and another accused fired a pistol. Rajinder Singh was convicted by the Trial Court, while co-accused Ran Singh and Krishna were acquitted. Rajinder Singh appealed his conviction, arguing the prosecution relied on interested and doubtful witnesses, and his co-accused's acquittal implied his own should be upheld. The question arose whether inimical eyewitness testimonies, corroborated by medical evidence, were sufficient to sustain Rajinder Singh's murder conviction. Finally, the High Court upheld Rajinder Singh's conviction and sentence, concluding that the eyewitness testimonies were not shattered and were supported by medical evidence, establishing his role in causing injuries with a pharsa, thereby confirming the Trial Court's decision.