The petitioner, through the medium of this writ petition, is challenging his preventive detention ordered by the respondent No. 2 – District Magistrate, Baramulla in terms of detention order No. ...
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
Reserved on: 04.04.2024
Pronounced on: 30.05.2024
Case:- WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
Suhail Ahmad Lone Aged about 24 Years,
S/o Mohammad Maqbool Lone R/o
Harwan Sopore,
Tehsil: Bomai Zainageer, District
Baramulla.
(Through His Brother-in-Law namely Javid
Ahmad Shah).
….Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. M. A. Wani, Advocate.
Vs
1. Union Territory of J&K through
Principal Secretary to Govt. Home Department, Civil Sectt.
Jammu/Srinagar.
2. District Magistrate Baramulla, Kashmir.
3. Senior Superintendent of Police, Sopore.
4. Superintendent of Central Jail, Kot Bhalwal Jammu.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Jehangir Ahmad Dar, GA.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI , JUDGE
JUDGMENT
(30.05.2024)
01. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the
respondents. Perused the writ pleadings and the record
therewith.
02. Whether with respect to an unchanged set of facts and
circumstances a subjective satisfaction of a District
Magistrate under Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, 2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
2 WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
1978 justify two preventive detention orders in succession
against same person both on different basis i.e.
maintenance of public order and security of State is the
question which this writ petition comes to pose to this
Court for an answer.
03. The petitioner, through the medium of this writ petition, is
challenging his preventive detention ordered by the
respondent No. 2 – District Magistrate, Baramulla in terms
of detention order No. 81/DMB/PSA/2022 dated
28.11.2022 thereby subjecting the petitioner to suffer
preventive detention by purportedly holding his activities
prejudicial to the security of the State warranting
curtailment of his fundamental right to personal liberty
otherwise guaranteed under article 21 of the Constitution of
India.
04. Before this Court comes to deal with the passing of the
aforementioned impugned detention order against the
petitioner, a reference needs to be made to a detention
order earlier made against the petitioner by the same very
District Magistrate, Baramulla acting at the instance of the
same very District Police, Sopore.
05. The Superintendent of Police (SP), Sopore had forward a
dossier vide a letter No. Pross/PSA/21/37102 dated
05.11.2021 thereby seeking preventive detention of the
petitioner by referring to the petitioner ’s alleged 2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
3 WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
involvement in FIR no. 109 of 2021, FIR no. 163 of 2021
and FIR no. 196 of 2021 all three registered by the Police
Station, Sopore.
06. This dossier had resulted in passing of a detention order
No. 27/DMB/PSA/2022 dated 09.11.2021 by the
respondent No. 2 – District Magistrate, Baramulla on the
ground that the petitioner’s alleged reported activities were
prejudicial to the “maintenance of public order of the State”
and, therefore, the petitioner came to be detained and
subjected to suffer detainment in the Central Jail Kot
Bhalwal, Jammu for a period of one year meaning the
maximum period prescribed for detention under section 8
of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Ac t, 1978
relatable to the ground of maintenance of public order.
07. The first time preventive detention of the petitioner dated
09.11.2021 order aforestated had taken place in the wake
of his arrest on 02.11.2021 in connection with the FIR no.
196 of 2021 dated 23.07.2021 registered by the Police
Station Sopore in which the petitioner figured as one of the
named accused persons.
08. For the sake of reference, this detention order dated
09.11.2021 along with grounds of detention framed in
support thereof by the respondent No. 2 – District
Magistrate, Baramulla are reproduced herein:-
2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
4 WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
“Office of the District Magistrate Baramulla
Subject: Detention under J&K Public Safety Act, 1978
Order No: 27/DMB/PSA/2021
Dated: 09-11-2021
Whereas, Superintendent of Police Sopore vide his office letter
No. Pross/PSA/21/102 dated 05.11.2021, has produced material
record, such as dossier and other connected documents viz copy of
FIR No: 109/2021, 163/2021, 196/2021, seizure memos etc. in
respect of Suhail Ahmad Lone S/o Mohammad Maqbool Lone R/o
Harwan Sopore, Tehsil Bomai Zaingeer, District Baramulla.
Whereas, I District Magistrate Baramulla have perused the
contents and recommendations mentioned in the dossier carefully,
produced before me in respect of said person.
Whereas, I am satisfied that with a view to prevent Suhail
Ahmad Lone S/o Mohammad Maqbool Lone R/o Harwan Sopore,
Tehsil Bomai Zaingeer, District Baramulla from acting in any manner
in the activities which are prejudicial to the maintenance of public
order and warrant immediate measures to be taken against the
subject to stop him from indulging in such activities which are
prejudicial to the maintenance of public order of the State.
Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by clause (a) of
section 8 of J&K Public Safety Act 1978, I District Magistrat e
Baramulla hereby direct that the aforesaid person be detained and
lodged in Central Jail Kotebhbulwal Jammu for a period to be
specified by the Government.
Sd/-
District Magistrate
Baramulla
No: DMB/PSA/2021/163 -167
Grounds of Detention
Name:- Suhail Ahmad Lone
Son of:- Mohammad Maqbool Lone.
Address:- Harwan Zaingir, Sopore.
Tehsil:- Bomai Zaingir.
District:- Baramulla.
Age:- 23 Years.
You were born in your native place and is 23 years of age. You
are an incorrigible anti social element who has been coming to the
adverse notice of Police for organizing and leading unlawful
demonstrations & pelting stones upon police/security forces in Area
Sopore in the wake of killing of LET terrorists namely Waseem Nazir
R/O Hatlangoo on 04-05-2021, LET Commander namely Mudasir
Ahmad Pandith R/O Dangerpora on 21 -06-2021 and terrorist of LET
outfit namely Fayaz Ahamd War R/O Warpora Sopore on 23-07-
2021. You have studies up to 12
th
standard from Higher Secondary
School Bomai Sopore and thereafter completed your BSc from Govt.
Degree College Sopore and is presently dealing with fruit business.
You have been identified as one of the main instigators of stone 2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
5 WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
pelting in Area Sopore following the killings of various terrorists of
Sopore area. Your aim and objective is to disturb the maintenance of
public order and to create an atmosphere conducive to propagation
of secessionist ideology. Your activities are directed towards
achieving this object which has a direct bearing upon the
maintenance of public order. During the recent past you have turned
an in corrigible anti social element and developed contacts with the
likeminded elements and has formed a gang like outfit which at every
available opportunity has been found resorting to stone pelting and
disturbing the public order in Sopore area.
You have been found motivating youth of area Sopore for
creating law and order incidents thereby disturbing peace and public
order on the ground by forcing the general public to observe strikes
on the killing to resort to stone pelting in Sopore area. It will be
pertinent to mention here that stone pelting incidents apart from
disturbing the public order endangers human life and property and a
number of police/security forces detailed for law and order duties
have been seriously injured during such incidents. The anti social
elements are desperately trying to keep the Sopore area on boil and
you are one of the important anti social elements to implement the
said strategy, which has assumed alarming proportions in recent
times.
You have been figuring adversely in police records for creating
law and order problems to disturb peace. You have been specifically
identified as an accused in the following cases of Police Station
Sopore;
1- Case FIR No. 109/2021 U/S 307, 147, 148, 149, 336, IPC.
2- Case FIR No. 163/2021 U/S 307, 147, 148, 149, 336, IPC.
3- Case FIR No. 196/2021 U/S 307, 147, 148, 149, 336, IPC.
Copies of FIR’s/site plan’s/seizure memos/statements are
enclosed marked as annexure A to A-5, B to B-5 and C to C-7
(Total 20 leaves)
However, you were arrested on 02-11-2021 in connection with
the investigation in case FIR No. 196/2021 U/S 307, 147, 148, 149,
336, IPC which was registered in Police Station Sopore against you
on 23-07-2021, when you alongwith your associates attacked the
police/security forces at main Chowk Warpora Sopore with the
intention to cause death. You are presently on Police remand in the
instant case. Although, you are presently under custody, but there is
a likelihood of your being admitted to bail and in case you are
released at this stage there is well founded apprehension that you
will again indulge in similar activities as have been mentioned above.
In order to stop you from indulging in activities which are
prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, your detention under
the provisions of J&K Public Safety Act – 1978 has become
imperative, as the normal law has not proved sufficient to stop you
from indulging in such activities.
In view of the above you are hereby detained under the
provisions of J&K Public Safety Act 1978, you have a right of making
representation before the Government in the Home Department or
before the undersigned within prescribed time period against your
detention, if you so choose.
Sd/-
District Magistrate
Baramulla
2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
6 WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
09. The petitioner came to challenge his said detention by filing
a writ petition WP (Crl) No. 86/2022 before this Court. This
writ petition was filed on 31.03.2022 and had remained
pending on the docket of this Court when the pendency of
the writ petition outlasted one year period of detention
inflicted upon the petitioner as a result whereof the writ
petition was rendered infructuous and came to be disposed
of accordingly in terms of an order dated 14.11.2022
whereby this Court called upon the detaining authority to
release the petitioner in case if he was not required in any
other case.
10. The petitioner in his petition has alleged that without
earning any release upon expiry of the detention period in
terms of the detention order No. 27/DMB/PSA/2022 dated
09.11.2021 and direction to said effect by this Court in
terms of its order dated 14.11.2022, the petitioner was
retained in illegal custody and just after period of 13 days
again came to be subjected to suffer next round of
preventive detention in terms of the impugned detention
order No. 81/DMB/PSA/2022 dated 28.11.202 2 on the
purported ground that the petitioner’s activities are
reckoned to be prejudicial to the security of the State
warranting his preventive detention. While the petitioner
was already lodged in Central Jail Kot Bhalwal, Jammu in a
state of illegal confinement, the second detention order 2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
7 WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
came to be executed upon him by showing its date of
execution to be 01.12.2022.
11. This second detention was ordered by the respondent No. 2
– District Magistrate, Baramulla purportedly acting upon a
dossier forwarded by the Senior Superintendent of Police
(SSP), Sopore vide a letter No. Pross/PSA/2022/37020-22
dated 25.11.2022 which was nothing but a repeat of the
earlier dossier served by the Senior Superintendent of
Police (SSP), Sopore on the basis of which the first
detention order No. 27/DMB/PSA/2022 dated 09.11.2021
was issued.
12. By literally guided and led by the said dossier dated
25.11.2022, the respondent No. 2 – District Magistrate,
Baramulla came to formulate purported grounds of
detention against the petitioner so as to draw purported
subjective satisfaction and passed the detention order No.
81/DMB/PSA/2022 dated 28.11.2022.
13. For the sake of reference, the impugned detention order as
well as grounds of detention in relation thereto passed and
framed by the respondent No. 2 – District Magistrate,
Baramulla are reproduced herein as under:-
“Office of the District Magistrate Baramulla
Subject: Detention under J&K Public Safety Act, 1978
Order No: 81/DMB/PSA/2022
Dated: 28-11-2022
2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
8 WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
Whereas Sr. Superintendent of Police Sopore vide his office letter
No. Pross/PSA/2022/37020 -22 dated 25-11-2022, has produced
dossier in respect of Suhail Ahmad Lone S/O Mohammad Maqbool
Lone R/o Harwan, Tehsil Bomai Zaingeer, District Baramulla.
Whereas, I District Magistrate Baramulla have perused the
contents and recommendations mentioned in the dossier carefully
produced before me in respect of said person.
Whereas, I am satisfied that with a view to prevent Suhail
Ahmad Lone S/O Mohammad Maqbool Lone R/O Harwan, Tehsil
Bomai Zaingeer, District Baramulla from acting in any manner in the
activities which are prejudicial to security of the state and warrant
immediate measures to be taken against the subject to stop him from
indulging in such activities which are prejudicial to the security of the
state.
Now, therefore in exercise of powers conferred by clause (a) of
section 8 of the J&K Public Safety Act 1978, I District Magistrate
Baramulla hereby direct that the aforesaid person be detained and
lodged in Central Jail Kotebhulwal Jammu for a period to be specified
by the Government.
Sd/-
District Magistrate
Baramulla
No: DMB/PSA/2022/432 -36
Grounds of Detention
Name:- Suhail Ahmad Lone
Son of:- Mohammad Maqbool Lone.
Address:- Harwan Bomai
Tehsil:- Bomai Zaingeer
District:- Baramulla
Category:- OGW
Age:- 24 Years.
While perusing the dossier submitted by SSP Sopore against
you, it has been reported that you were born in your native Harvan
Bomai, Sopore and is 24 years old. As reported by the Police, you have
been noticed as an incorrigible anti national/social element and
remained involved in organizing and leading unlawful demonstrations
& pelting stones upon police/security forces in Area Sopore after the
killing of LeT terrotists namely Waseem Nazir R/O Hatlangoo on 04-
05-2021, LeT Commander namely Mudasir Ahmad Pandith R/O
Dangerpora on 21-06-2021 and terrorist of LeT outfit namely Fayaz
Ahamd War R/O Warpora Sopore on 23 -07-2021. Your were found
previously involved in below mentioned criminal cases of PD Sopore.
1- Case FIR No. 109/2021 U/S 307, 147, 148, 149, 336, IPC.
2- Case FIR No. 163/2021 U/S 307, 147, 148, 149, 336, IPC.
3- Case FIR No. 196/2021 U/S 307, 147, 148, 149, 336, IPC.
You were detained und er PSA vide this office order No:
27/DMB/PSA/2021 dated 09 -11-2021, being involved, as reported by 2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
9 WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
the police in the aforementioned unlawful/criminal activities.
However, Hon’ble High court of J&K at Srinagar in its order dated 14-
11-2022 ordered your release. Reportedly, after your release, as per
the reliable and credible information/reports received by police from
various agencies, your activities have been noticed as a threat to the
National Security and Integrity of the Union of India as you have
reportedly, voluntarily developed contacts with various
terrorist/secessionist organizations and associates yourself with LeT
outfit to carry out the activities related to secessionism and terrorism.
LeT terrorist organization acts on directions and sermons of handlers
across the border for terrorist related activities.
It has been further been reported in the dossier prepared by
police that on the basis of inputs received from various agencies and
blogs on Social Media platform establishes that LeT is being controlled
by ISI of Pakistan and on their advice and directions they are carrying
out terrorist activities like killings of soft targets like street vendors,
labourers from outside J&K UT, working in J&K, policemen who are
off duty or are unarmed, so as to create an atmosphere of fear and
intimidation being detrimental for integrity and sovereignty of the
country. You were reportedly providing all kinds of help and logistics
to the terrorists in the past and it is apprehended on the basis of
inputs from various reliable sources/agencies, that you will again join
and terrorist organization and choose the same path on behest of LeT
outfit and handlers across the border, in case you remain at large at
this stage. The recent use of VOIP, VPN, encrypted messaging
applications and hotspots by such individuals have made their
identification and apprehensions difficult. It has turned possible by
the coordinated and strenuous efforts made by various agencies to
identify you and unearth your linkages with terrorist outfits again in
the face of the use of extreme and modern communication technology
by the individual to evade being identified.
In view of your previous track of record and apprehension of
your re-involvement in unlawful/terrorist activities, putforth by the
Police and your remaining at large at this stage, it has become
imperative to detain you so that the efforts of police and other law
enforcement agencies do not go in vain, who are making every effort to
put an end to the mindless killing of civilians in the UT of J&K,
otherwise it may be difficult for the police and other law enforcement
agencies to reign in on the terror outfits operating in J&K as you are
an important arm of the terror ecosystem, currently operating in J&K.
Your activities referred to above are not only pre-judicial to the
security of the state but are also aimed to recycle vicious terror
atmosphere and create an atmosphere conducive for secessionists and
terrorists to destabilize the government machinery.
In order to stop you from indulging in activities which are
prejudicial to the maintenance of the security of state, your detention
under Public Safety Act-1978 has become imperative as the normal
law has not proved sufficient to deter you from indulging in such
activities.
In view of the above, you are hereby detained under the
provision of J&K Public Safety Act-1978. You have a right of making a
representation before the Government in the Home Department
against your detention, if you choose so.”
Sd/-
District Magistrate
Baramulla
2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
10 WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
14. The preventive detention of the petitioner came to be
confirmed by the Govt. of UT of Jammu and Kashmir by
virtue of Govt. order No. Home/PB-V/3256 of 2022 dated
26.12.2022 whereby the petitioner’s detention was declared
confirmed and was ordered to be detained outside the UT of
Jammu and Kashmir in the District Jail Bareilly, Uttar
Pradesh (UP).
15. The institution of the present writ petition came to take
place on 28.12.2022. It is after the institution of the writ
petition that the petitioner’s detention was further extended
by virtue of Govt. order No. Home/PB -V/1080 of 2023
dated 16.05.2023.
16. It is in the aforesaid state of facts and circumstances that
the petitioner is challenging his preventive detention as
being illegal and unwarranted carried out on the frivolous
exercise of discretion at the end of the respondent No. 2 –
District Magistrate, Baramulla.
17. When this Court makes a comparative reading of the two
detention orders above referred alongwit h respective
grounds of detention supporting the said two detention
orders, this Court comes to see them replica of each other
except an addition of one or two paragraphs in the grounds
of detention which came to be formulated by the
respondent No. 2 – District Magistrate, Baramulla in
support of his second detention order and the addition of 2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
11 WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
said paragraphs is nothing but just bad branding and
name calling of the petitioner without any factual content
therein.
18. There is absolutely nothing in the name of the facts as to
what happened in the intervening 13 days of purported
liberty of the petitioner upon his purported release upon
the passing of the order dated 14.11.2022 by this Court in
WP(Crl) No. 86/2022 and 28.11.2022 when the impugned
preventive detention order came to be passed against the
petitioner by the respondent No. 2 – District Magistrate,
Baramulla.
19. This Court is left to wonder that for the selfsame set of
circumstances without any iota of change except
intervention of 13 days in between from expiry of first
detention order dated 09.11.2021 in terms of order dated
14.11.2022 of this Court in terms whereof the petitioner
was order to be let off and the passing of the second
detention order dated 28.11.2022 how come the very same
set of facts and circumstances at the first instance were
held to be prejudicial to the maintenance of Public Order
and second time to be prejudicial to the security of the
State.
20. It is, thus, rendered clear that the so called subjective
satisfaction of the respondent No. 2 – District Magistrate,
Baramulla is nothing but matter of word play taking it for 2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
12 WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
granted that District Magistrate as well as the Govt. of UT
of Jammu and Kashmir have omnipotent power and
authority to subject any person to suffer preventive
detention at any given point of time and for that matter any
given District Magistrate or Govt. of UT of Jammu and
Kashmir by appropriating expression of his and its liking in
terms of the grounds of detention envisaged under section 8
of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978, can
feel free to subject a person to suffer loss of personal liberty
in the name of an order passed under Jammu and Kashmir
Public Safety Act, 1978 as if exercise of preventive detention
jurisdiction is answerable and/or accountable to no one.
Such misconception at the end of the respondent No. 2 –
District Magistrate, Baramulla needs a reality check that
the constitutional courts are the guardian of the guarantees
of fundamental rights to the citizens of the country and in
the event of violation of a fundamental right in particular
that of right to life and personal liberty, a constitutional
court is meant not only to be extra sensitive but pro-active
in immediately curbing the situation which is generating
the violation of said fundamental right to life and personal
liberty.
21. In view of the aforesaid, the preventive detention of the
petitioner is held and declared to be illegal per se and,
therefore, the impugned preventive detention order No. 2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
13 WP(Crl) No. 829/2022
81/DMB/PSA/2022 dated 28.11.2022 read with
consequent approval/confirmation order passed by the
Govt. of UT of Jammu and Kashmir are hereby quashed
and petitioner is directed to be released to his personal
liberty not only by the Superintendent of the concerned Jail
wherever the petitioner is detained but also by the
respondent No. 2 – District Magistrate, Baramulla to ensure
that the petitioner is released from the said Jail at the
earliest.
22. Disposed of.
(RAHUL BHARTI )
JUDGE
JAMMU
30.05.2024
Bunty
Whether the order is speaking: Yes
Whether the order is reportable: Yes 2024:JKLHC-SGR:186
Legal Notes
Add a Note....