As per case facts, Suresh Chand, implicated in an NDPS Act case, sought bail. Co-accused were arrested with charas and, in custody, revealed purchasing it from Chand, with partial payment ... via Google Pay and corresponding bank transactions and call detail records. Chand asserted false implication, arguing co-accused confessions to police are inadmissible. The question arose whether bail should be granted given the reliance on co-accused statements, bank transfers, and CDRs, and the legal constraints on their admissibility. Finally, the Court ruled that co-accused's police confessions are inadmissible as per Tofan Singh precedent. It further noted bank transactions alone do not presume involvement, and CDRs (metadata only) cannot establish criminal liability without call recordings. Finding the Section 37(b)(ii) conditions met, implying no guilt and low likelihood of re-offence, the Court granted bail with conditions.