As per the case facts, individuals accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act were denied anticipatory bail by previous court orders. These individuals were not arrested when the initial ... report was filed but faced charges after the Special Court acknowledged the offense. The appeal to the Supreme Court centered on the common legal issues arising from these circumstances. The question arose concerning the obligations of accused individuals who were not arrested before a special court recognized an offense under the PMLA, specifically whether they could avoid personal appearances in court if not explicitly exempted. Finally, the Supreme Court clarified that such accused persons are not entitled to a general exemption from personal appearance and must attend the Special Court on scheduled dates unless specifically exempted under legal provisions. They are also required to furnish bonds. Warrants issued against them will only be canceled if they comply with these requirements within a month, during which period the warrants will not be executed.