Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
As per the case facts, the State of Maharashtra appealed a High Court judgment that exempted educational institutions from paying electricity duty. These institutions, run by a registered society and
...public charitable trust, were previously exempt under the 1958 Electricity Duty Act. However, electricity duty was levied after the 2016 Act came into effect. The reason for the appeal to the Supreme Court was the State's contention that the High Court erred in setting aside the levy of electricity duty under the new Act. The question arose whether educational institutions, previously exempt from electricity duty under the old act, were still exempt under the Maharashtra Electricity Duty Act, 2016, or if the new Act permitted the levy of such duty on them. Finally, the Supreme Court found that the High Court committed a grave error in setting aside the levy of electricity duty on the original writ petitioners. It stated that the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court was unsustainable both on law and facts, and therefore, it allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....